文章检索
复杂网络

基于动态级联失效的开发者协作网络鲁棒性研究

  • 周琴 ,
  • 徐桂琼 ,
  • 周琴 ,
  • 徐桂琼
展开
  • 上海大学管理学院,上海 200444
周 琴(1999-),女,四川南充人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为复杂系统建模、开源技术与开源社区网络演化。

收稿日期: 2023-06-27

  修回日期: 2023-11-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(11871328);上海市“科技创新”软科学重点项目(2106909800)

Research on the Robustness of Developer Collaboration Network Based on Dynamic Cascading Failure

  • ZHOU Qin ,
  • XU Guiqiong ,
  • ZHOU Qin ,
  • XU Guiqiong
Expand
  • School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received date: 2023-06-27

  Revised date: 2023-11-10

  Online published: 2025-04-27

摘要

开源社区关键开发者流失会造成剩余开发者心理和行为变化,引发系列级联效应。考虑跟随效应下关键开发者流失对剩余开发者工作强度和协作意愿的影响,设计负载容量变化的动态级联失效模型,并以开源设计平台AngularJS为例,探究开发者协作网络鲁棒性。研究发现:开源社区开发者协作网络抗干扰能力阈值存在最优区间;网络鲁棒性受初始负载分布的影响极大且在最高负载节点流失方式下最弱。研究结果为开源社区的管理运营提供了理论指导和支持。

本文引用格式

周琴 , 徐桂琼 , 周琴 , 徐桂琼 . 基于动态级联失效的开发者协作网络鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025 , 22(1) : 33 -42 . DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2025.01.005

Abstract

The loss of key developers in the open-source community will cause changes in the psychology and behavior of remaining developers, leading to a series of cascading effects. Considering the impact of the loss of key developers on the work intensity and collaboration willingness of remaining developers under the following effect, a dynamic cascade failure model with load capacity changes is designed. Taking the open-source design platform AngularJS as an example, the dynamic robustness of the open-source community developer collaboration network is investigated. The results show that the threshold of anti-interference ability of open-source community developer collaboration network has an optimal interval. The robustness of the developer collaboration network is greatly affected by the initial load distribution and is the weakest in the mode of the highest load node loss. The results are beneficial for the management and operation of open-source community.

参考文献

[1] 彭巍, 胡远航, 龚壮辉. 生态视角的复杂产品协同设计网络稳定性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 88-94.
PENG W, HU Y H, GONG Z H. Stability of complex product collaborative design network from ecological perspective[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2023, 20(1): 88-94.
[2] 焦豪, 杨季枫. 数字技术开源社区的治理机制: 基于悖论视角的双案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 28(11): 207-232.
JIAO H, YANG J F. The governance mechanism of digital technology-based open source community: a comparative case study from the paradox perspective[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 28(11): 207-232.
[3] 齐佳音, 张国锋, 王伟. 开源数字经济的创新逻辑: 大数据合作资产视角[J]. 北京交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 2021, 20(3): 37-49.
QI J Y, ZHANG G F, WANG W. Innovation logic of open source digital economy: the perspective of big data cooperation asset[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 20(3): 37-49.
[4] 李英姿, 张硕, 张晓冬. 面向开源设计演化过程的关键影响因素综述[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8): 13-22.
LI Y Z, ZHANG S, ZHANG X D. A review of key impacting factors in the evolution process of open source design[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8): 13-22.
[5] KHAN B, MUFTI M R. Evolution of influential developer’s communities in oss and its impact on quality[J]. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 2021, 28(2): 337-352.
[6] QI Q, CAO J. METHODS: A meta-path-based method for heterogeneous community detection in the open source software ecosystem[J]. Information and Software Technology, 2023, 162: 107271.
[7] 徐冰村, 张晓冬. 开源社区中的意见领袖识别及跟随效应仿真[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(12): 101-107.
XU B C, ZHANG X D. Opinion leader identification and following effect simulation in the open source community[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2019, 42(12): 101-107.
[8] ZHAO Q, YAO X J, DANG X Y, et al. The nodes influence maximization in open source software community based on probability propagation model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(4): 2386-2395.
[9] BARABASI A L. Network Science[M]. The United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
[10] OH W, JEON S. Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: the ising perspective[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1086-1101.
[11] FUGE M, TEE K, AGOGINO A, et al. Analysis of collaborative design networks: a case study of OpenIDEO[J]. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2014, 14(2): 021009.
[12] GAMALIELSSON J, LUNDELL B. Sustainability of open source software communities beyond a fork: how and why has the LibreOffice project evolved?[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2014, 89: 128-145.
[13] ZHOU H L, ZHANG X D, HU Y. Robustness of open source product innovation community’s knowledge collaboration network under the dynamic environment[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 540: 122888.
[14] 卢冬冬, 吴洁, 刘鹏, 等. 开源软件核心开发者流失的级联效应仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(2): 51-59.
LU D D, WU J, LIU P, et al. Simulation of the cascading effect by core developers turnover in open source software[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2021, 18(2): 51-59.
[15] 魏龙, 党兴华. 基于组织-惯例的相依技术创新网络级联失效模型研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(11): 74-88.
WEI L, DANG X H. Research on cascading failure model of organization-routine interdependent technological innovation network[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(11): 74-88.
[16] AN F, WU S, GAO X Y, et al. A quantification method of non-failure cascading spreading in a network of networks[J]. Chaos: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2021, 31(12): 123122.
[17] MOTTER A E, LAI Y C. Cascade-based attacks on complex networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2002, 66(6): 065102.
[18] YI C Q, BAO Y Y, JIANG J C, et al. Modeling cascading failures with the crisis of trust in social networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2015, 436: 256-271.
[19] DUAN P S, ZHOU J L. Cascading vulnerability analysis of unsafe behaviors of construction workers from the perspective of network modeling[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2021, 30(3): 1037-1060.
[20] WANG J W, WANG Z W, WANG S Y. Abnormal dynamics in cascading model with gravitational effect[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 105(1): 887-898.
[21] HAO Y C, WANG Y H, JIA L M, et al. Cascading failures in networks with the harmonic closeness under edge attack strategies[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2020, 135: 109772.
[22] WANG S L, LÜ W Z, ZHAO L F, et al. Structural and functional robustness of networked critical infrastructure systems under different failure scenarios[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 523: 476-487.
[23] WANG W B, SONG Y R, LI Y W, et al. Research on cascading failures model of power grid based on complex network[C]//Chinese Control and Decision Conference. Hefei, China: IEEE, 2020: 1367-1372.
[24] 夏昊翔, 张潇, 张醒洲. OpenStack开源软件开发者协作网络分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(5): 1373-1382.
XIA H X, ZHANG X, ZHANG X Z. Study on collaborative network of OpenStack OSS developers[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(5): 1373-1382.
[25] CHRISTAKIS N A, FOWLER J H. Socialcontagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior [J]. Statistics in Medicine, 2013, 32(4): 550-577.
文章导航

/

〈 〉