从分析互联网体系结构与当前主流应用范型的失配入手,提出了一种二元互补的未来互联网体系结构,它以现有互联网体系结构为主结构,同时引入播存网络作为次结构。二元互补未来互联网体系结构能在最大程度保持现有互联网特色和优势的同时,为未来互联网带来前所未有的物理变革。
By analyzing the mismatching between current Internet architecture and Internet’s mainstream application paradigm, a complementary binary future Internet architecture is proposed in this paper, which consists of a primary structure （the current Internet architecture) and a secondary structure （the broadcast-storage network). This new Internet architecture can not only maintain some irreplaceable advantages and features of the existing Internet architecture, but also bring unprecedented physical revolution for the future Internet.
[1] Kleinrock L. Information flow in large communication nets[D]. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961.
[2] Saltzer J H, Reed D P, Clark D D. End-to-end arguments in system design[J]. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 1984, 2（4):277-288.
[3] Clark D, Tennenhouse D. Architectural considerations for a new generation of protocols[J]. Computer Communications Review. 1990, 20（4):200-208.
[4] Blumenthal M S, Clark D D. Rethinking the design of the internet:the end to end arguments vs. the brave new world[J]. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 2001,1（1):70-109.
[5] Clark D D, Wroclawski J, Sollins K K, et al. Tussle in cyberspace:defining tomorrow′s internet[J].IEEE/ACM Tran-sactions on Networking,2005,13（3):462-475.
[6] Zhang L, Estrin D, Burke J, et al. Named data networking （NDN) project, NDN-0001[EB/OL].[2010-10-31]. http://named-data.net/ndn-proj.pdf.
[7] Ahlgren B, Dannewitz C, Imbrenda C, et al. A survey of information-centric networking[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2012, 50（7):26-36.
[8] Rexford J, Dovrolis C. Future internet architecture:clean-slate versus evolutionary research[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2010, 53（9):36-40.
[9] Pathan I A M K, Buyya R. A taxonomy and survey of CDNs, technical report, GRIDS-TR-2007-4[R]. Australia:The University of Melbourne, 2007.
[10] Androutsellis-Theotokis S, Spinellis D. A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2004, 36（4):335-371.
[11] Gritter M, Cheriton D R. An architecture for content routing support in the internet[C]//The 3rd conference on USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems,San Francisco, CA, 2001:37-48.
[12] Koponen T, Chawla M, Chun B-G, et al. A data-oriented （and beyond) network architecture[C]//ACM SIGCOMM’07.Kyoto, 2007.
[13] Welcome to the PSRP project homepage[EB/OL].[2013-03-06].http://www.psirp.org, 2010.
[14] Ahlgren B, Ambrosio M D, Axelsson E, et al. D-3.1 （D-B.1) The network of information:architecture and applications[DB/OL].[2011-07-31]. http://www.sail-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/SAIL_DB1_v1_0_final-Public.pdf.
[15] Jacobson V, Smetters D K, Thornton J D, et al. Networking named content[C]//ACM CoNEXT’09, New York, USA, 2009:1-12.
[16] Anand A, Dogar F, Han D, et al. XIA:an architecture for an evolvable and trustworthy Internet[C]//ACM Hotnets-X. Cambridge,MA, USA, 2011.
[17] Mobility first future internet architecture project vision[EB/OL].[2013-03-06]. http://mobilityfirst.winlab.rutgers.edu/Vision.html.
[18] Xie G G, Sun Y, Zhang Y J, et al. Service-oriented future internet architecture （SOFIA)[C]//IEEE Infocom/Poster. Shanghai, China, 2011.
[19] 100 x 100 clean slate project[EB/OL].[2013-03-06]. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Projects/Data/274.html.
[20] Albert R, Barabási A-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74:47-97.
[21] Wang X F, Chen G. Complex networks:small-world, scale-free, and beyond[J]. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 2003, 3（1):6-20.
[22] Willinger W, Doyle J. Robustness and the Internet:design and evolution[EB/OL].[2013-01-10]. http://netlab.caltech.edu/pub/papers/part1_vers4.pdf.
