基于SD模型的契约与隐性知识转移研究

doi:10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.01.013

复杂系统与复杂性科学

2022, Vol. 19

Issue (1): 96-103 DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.01.013

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

基于SD模型的契约与隐性知识转移研究

张梦晓, 高良谋

东北财经大学工商管理学院,辽宁大连 116025

Systems Dynanics-based Study on Contract and Tacit Knowledge Transfer

ZHANG Mengxiao, GAO Liangmou

School of Business Administration,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025, China

摘要
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF(4273 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要契约视角下的隐性知识转移研究仍有不足,为探究正式/非正式契约对隐性知识转移的系统性影响,提炼出4项转移机制:信任程度、交易成本、专利风险和契约刚性,并构建SD模型,应用Vensim PLE进行仿真和灵敏度分析。结果表明:正式/非正式契约的影响路径与影响效果存在差异性,在中低水平正式契约和中高水平非正式契约的协同效应下,隐性知识转移量最大,隐性知识转移更依赖于非正式契约,这为企业的契约治理提供了借鉴依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张梦晓
	高良谋

关键词 ：正式/非正式契约, 隐性知识, 转移机制, SD

Abstract：There are still some weaknesses of the research on tacit knowledge transfer from the perspective of contract. To explore the systematic impact of formal/informal contracts on tacit knowledge transfer, this paper extracts four transfer mechanisms, trust level, transaction cost, patent risk and contract rigidity, and builds a SD model, then uses Vensim PLE for simulation and sensitivity analysis. The results show that, there are differences in the influence path and impact effect of formal/informal contracts, under the synergistic effect of low-level formal contracts and high-level informal contracts, tacit knowledge transfer amount is the largest. Tacit knowledge transfer is more dependent on informal contracts, which provides a basis for enterprise contract governance.

Key words： formal/informal contract tacit knowledge transfer mechanism systems dynamics

收稿日期: 2020-11-23 出版日期: 2022-02-21

ZTFLH:

273.7

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目(11Z&D153);国家自然科学基金青年基金(71802042)

作者简介: 张梦晓(1988-),女,河北石家庄人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为技术创新、创新管理。

引用本文:

张梦晓, 高良谋. 基于SD模型的契约与隐性知识转移研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(1): 96-103.
ZHANG Mengxiao, GAO Liangmou. Systems Dynanics-based Study on Contract and Tacit Knowledge Transfer. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2022, 19(1): 96-103.

链接本文:

http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.01.013 或 http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V19/I1/96

[1] COOKE F L. Maintaining change: the maintenance function and the change process. New technology[J]. Work and Employment,2003, l(1): 35-49.
[2] DAS T K, TENG B S. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(1):31-61.
[3] 李健, 金占明. 战略联盟伙伴选择、竞合关系与联盟绩效研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007, 28(11):161-166.
LI J, JIN Z M. The alliance partner selection, coopetition and alliance performance[J]. Science of Science and Management of S &T, 2007, 28(11):161-166.
[4] 路风. 走向自主创新:寻求中国力量的源泉[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2019.
[5] WILLIAMSON O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism[M]. New York: Free Press,1985.
[6] HEIDE J B,JOHN G.Do norms matter in marketing relationships?[J].Journal of Marketing,1992,56(2):32-44.
[7] LUSCH R F, BROWN J R. Interdependency,contracting,and relational behavior in marketing channels[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1996, 60(4): 19-38.
[8] 陈伟, 张旭梅, 宋寒. 供应链企业间知识交易的关系契约机制: 基于合作创新的研究视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(7):38-48.
CHEN W, ZHANG X M, SONG H. A study on the relational contract of knowledge trading among members in the supply chain enterprises based on the perspective of cooperative innovation[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2015, 36(7):38-48.
[9] 王清晓. 契约与关系共同治理的供应链知识协同机制[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(10):1532-1540.
WANG Q X. Mechanism of knowledge collaboration in supply chain based on contractual and relational governance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2016, 34(10):1532-1540.
[10] LI J J, POPPO L, ZHOU K Z.Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(4): 349-370.
[11] 王龙伟,宋美鸽,李晓冬.契约完备程度对隐性知识获取影响的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018,39(12):53-60.
WANG L W, SONG M G, LI X D.An empirical study of the effect of contract completeness on tacit knowledge acquisition[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2018,39(12):53-60.
[12] 刁丽琳, 朱桂龙. 产学研合作中的契约维度、信任与知识转移-基于多案例的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(6):890-901.
DIAO L L, ZHU G L.Contractual dimensions, trust and knowledge transfer in university-industry cooperation: based on multi-case study[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2014, 32(6):890-901.
[13] 陈怀超, 卢彦丞, 丛贞, 等. 知识型服务企业员工与客户隐性知识共享的系统动力学研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(2):127-138.
CHEN H C, LU Y C, CONG Z, et al. System dynamics study on the tacit knowledge sharing between employees and customers of knowledge service enterprises[J]. Management Review,2020, 32(2):127-138.
[14] 刘娴, 宋波, 徐飞. R&D联盟企业隐性知识转移的系统动力学[J]. 系统管理学报, 2014, 23(5):620-627,635.
LIU X, SONG B, XU F. System dynamics modeling for tacit knowledge transfer of a firm in the R&D alliance[J].Journal of Systems & Management, 2014, 23(5):620-627,635.
[15] 李志宏, 赖文娣, 白雪.高校科研团队隐性知识共享的系统动力学分析[J]. 管理学报, 2012, 9(10):1495-1504.
LI Z H, LAI W D, BAI X.The System dynamic study on tacit knowledge sharing in the scientific research team of universities[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2012, 9(10):1495-1504.
[16] 王培林, 周燕. 对产学研隐性知识转移中的知识破损的理性思考[J].情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(2):39-43.
WANG P L, ZHOU Y. Rational considerations of knowledge damage in tacit knowledge transfer of industry-university-research[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2015, 38(2):39-43.
[17] DAS T K, TENG B S.Trust, control and risk in strategical liances: an integrated framework[J].Organization Studies, 2001, 22(2): 251-283.
[18] GHOSHAL S, MORAN P.Bad for practice: a critique of transaction cost theory [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(1): 13-47.
[19] JOSHI A W,STUMP R L. Determinants of commitment and opportunism: Integrating and extending insights from transaction cost analysis and relational exchange theory[J]. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 1999, 16(4):334-352.
[20] 盛乐. 关系性契约、契约成本和人力资本产权的界定[J]. 经济科学, 2003,25(4):5-15.
SHENG L. Definition of relational contract, contract cost and human capital property rights[J]. Economic Science, 2003,25(4):5-15.
[21] WILLIAMSON O E. The logic of economic organization[J]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1988, 4(1):65-93.
[22] ROEHRICH J K, LEWIS M A.Towards a model of governance in complex (product-service) inter-organizational systems[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2010, 28(11): 1155-1164.
[23] CAO L, MOHAN K, RAMESH B, et al. Evolution of governance: achieving ambidexterity in IT outsourcing[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, 30(3): 115-140.
[24] GOO J, KISHORE R, RAO H, et al. The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2009, 33 (1): 119-145.
[25] HUBER T, FISCHER T, DIBBERN J, et al.A process model of complementarity and substitution of contractual and relational governance in IS outsourcing[J]. Journal of Management Information System, 2013, 30 (3):81-114.
[26] CRUZ C O, MARQUES R C. Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public-private partnerships[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2013, 31(3): 473-483.
[27] CANNON J P, ACHROL R S, GUNDLACH G T.Contracts, norms, and plural form governance[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2000, 28 (2):180-194.
[28] 胡健, 刘佳杰, 孙金花. 基于SD模型的虚拟社区中个体隐性知识共享行为研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(5):77-85.
HU J, LIU J J, SUN J H. Research on individual tacit knowledge sharing in virtual community based on SD model[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application, 2019, 42(5):77-85.
[29] 张慧, 张舒婷. R&D联盟治理机制对知识转移的影响研究-基于系统动力学的建模与仿真[J].自然辩证法研究, 2017, 33(12): 38-44.
ZHANG H, ZHANG S T. Influence of R&D alliance governance mechanism on knowledge transfer: based on modeling and simulation of system dynamics[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2017, 33(12): 38-44.

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed