Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2014, Vol. 11 Issue (2): 36-43    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2014.02.005
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
贿赂博弈的实验经济学分析
于同奎, 王瀚, 雷靖, 冯瑾
西南大学计算机与信息科学学院,重庆 北碚 400715
An Experimental Analysis of Bribery Game
YU Tong-kui, WANG Han, LEI Jing, FENG Jin
College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Beibei 400715, China
全文: PDF(829 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 利用实验经济学的方法分析社会贿赂现象。首先利用z-Tree软件开发基于局域网的实验平台,然后招募受试者参加群体交互行为实验,最后对数据分析得到结论,实验结果表明惩罚对贿赂行为有较大的震慑作用。还比较了博弈双方固定匹配和随机匹配两种情形,发现固定匹配情况下公职人员与普通民众之间更容易达成行贿受贿的默契,说明公职人员的轮岗制度是防治腐败的有效途径。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
于同奎
王瀚
雷靖
冯瑾
关键词 贿赂行为经济学行为实验惩罚轮岗    
Abstract:This research carries on economics behavioral experiments to study bribery. An experimental platform is designed using the software zTree. Subjects are enrolled to perform the collective interactive experiments. The produced data is analyzed to provide some implications. The experiment results show that the deterrence of punishment is very significant. We also compare the two matching situations, fixed-matching and random-matching. The experiment results show that corruption is easier to be achieved in fixed-match than random-matching which implies that the position rotational system can effectively prevent the occurrence of corruption.
Key wordsbribery    economics behavioral experiments    punishment    position rotation
收稿日期: 2013-04-14      出版日期: 2026-06-22
基金资助:国家自然科学基金 (71201129);教育部基本科研业务费(XDJK2012C067);西南大学博士基金(SWU111037);西南大学教育教学研究改革项目(2012JY019).
作者简介: 于同奎(1981- ),男,山东日照人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为复杂经济系统、演化和制度经济学、基于主体的计算经济学等。
引用本文:   
于同奎, 王瀚, 雷靖, 冯瑾. 贿赂博弈的实验经济学分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2014, 11(2): 36-43.
YU Tong-kui, WANG Han, LEI Jing, FENG Jin. An Experimental Analysis of Bribery Game[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2014, 11(2): 36-43.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2014.02.005      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2014/V11/I2/36
[1] Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Corruption[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3):599-617.
[2] Jain A K. Corruption:a review[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2001, 15(1):71-121.
[3] D’Andrade K. Bribery[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1985, 4 (4):239-248.
[4] Svensson J. Eight questions about corruption[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19 (3):19-42.
[5] Murphy K M, Shleifer A, Vishny R W. Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?[J]. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(2):409-414.
[6] Mauro P. Corruption and growth[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(3):681-712.
[7] Mo P H. Corruption and economic growth[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2001, 29(1):66-79.
[8] Olken B A. Corruption and the costs of redistribution:micro evidence from Indonesia[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2006, 90 (4/5):853-870.
[9] Dong B, Torgler B. Causes of corruption:evidence from China[J]. China Economic Review, 2013, 26:152-169.
[10] Transparency International. Corruption perceptions index[R]. Transparency International,2012.
[11] 胡锦涛. 坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进 为全面建成小康社会而奋斗——在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告[R].北京:人民出版社,2012.
Hu Jintao. Firmly march on the path of socialism with chinese characteristics and strive to complete the building of a mo-derately prosperous society in all respects:report at 18th party congress[R].Beijing:People’s Publishing House,2012.
[12] Lambsdorff J G. Making corrupt deals:contracting in the shadow of the law[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2002, 48 (3):221-241.
[13] Gary S B,George J S. Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers[J]. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1974, 3(1):1-18.
[14] Krueger A O. The political economy of the rent-seeking society[J]. American Economic Review, 1974, 64(3):291-303.
[15] Ackerman S R. Corruption:a Study in Political Economy[M]. New York:Academic Press.1978.
[16] Treisman D. The causes of corruption:a cross-national study[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2000, 76 (3):399-457.
[17] Lederman D, Loayza N V, Soares R R. Accountability and corruption:political institutions matter[J]. Economics & Politics, 2005, 17 (1):1-35.
[18] Truex R. Corruption, attitudes, and education:survey evidence from nepal[J]. World Development, 2011, 39 (7):1133-1142.
[19] Treisman D. What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research[J]. Annual Review of Political Science, 2007, 10 (1):211-244.
[20] Olken B A. Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2009, 93 (7/8):950-964.
[21] Bobkova N, Egbert H. Corruption investigated in the lab:a survey of the experimental literature[J]. The International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences, 2012, 2 (4):337-348.
[22] Serra D, Wantchekon L. New Advances in Experimental Research on Corruption[M]. UK:Emerald Group Publishing Bingley, 2012.
[23] Fischbacher U. Z-tree:zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments[J]. Experimental Economics, 2007,10(2):171-178.
[1] 余路粉, 孙文静, 潘文林, 张天军, 胡志涛, 聂腾涛. 基于加权惩罚局部结构熵的时序网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(2): 57-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed