Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2018, Vol. 15 Issue (2): 54-61    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.02.007
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
族际冲突的社会表征:词汇网络分析视角
胡发稳1,2, 李丽菊2, 王沛3, 韩忠太1
1.云南民族大学云南省民族研究所,昆明 650031;
2.大理大学教育科学学院,云南 大理 671003;
3.上海师范大学心理学系,上海 200234
Social Representations on Interethnic Conflict: From a Lexical Network Analysis Perspective
HU Fawen, LI Liju, WANG Pei, HAN Zhongtai
1.Yunnan Provincial Institute for Ethnic Studies,Yunnan Minzu University,Kunming 650031,China;
2.School of Educational Science,Dali University,Dali 671003,China;
3.Department of Psychology,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China
全文: PDF(5650 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探索族际冲突的社会表征及其核心要素,以“族际冲突”为激发词,采用词汇联想测试对220名大学生进行自由联想反应,然后应用可视化网络图、K-核解析的复杂网络分析技术解析激发词汇网络结构,并比较了彝汉两民族的表征差异。结果表明:“族际冲突”社会表征是一个以“战争”和“打架”为中心内核组织起来的5-核多层复杂网络,其整体意义产生于“矛盾、战争、斗争、冲突、和平、民族、团结、种族歧视、和谐、打架、歧视、文化、流血、利益”14个中心核元素及其关联性。除了两族有着相似的整体网络特征外,彝族被试主要使用因果论思维,强调“民族”元素,表征为以“死亡(纠纷)→打架(内乱)→战争(矛盾)”为核心轴的层级模型。汉族使用目的论思维,强调“流血”元素,以“语言(分争)→利益(打斗)→战争(和谐)”为分类主轴进行社会表征。结论认为族际冲突的社会表征是一个多层级网络结构,存在民族差异。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
胡发稳
李丽菊
王沛
韩忠太
关键词 族际冲突社会表征词汇联想测试k-核解析    
Abstract:To explore social representations of interethnic conflict and its core elements, this article used a word-association test with interethnic conflict as stimulus to collect 220 college students’ free association responses. Then complex network analysis techniques including network visualization, k-core decomposition were used for analyzing the structures of the evoked words networks, and comparing the representational differences between Yi and Han ethnic groups. Results indicated that the social representations of interethnic conflict was a 5-core multilayer network organized by the two core nuclei: war and fight, and its global meaning generated from the following 14 shared core elements and their connections: Contradiction, war, struggle, conflict, peace, ethnicity, solidarity, racial discrimination, harmony, fight, discrimination, culture, bleeding, and profit. Apart from the similar structure properties in the two groups, Yi mainly represented the interethnic conflict as a nested hierarchical network model constructed on the core axis of the death (dispute) → fight (civil strife) → war (contradiction), emphasizing a causal associations among these levels, and focused on the ethnicity element. Whilst based on the category axis of the language (strife) → interest (tussle) → war (harmony), Han socially represented the interethnic conflict from the angle of teleology, stressing on the bleeding element. The conclusion suggested that the social representation of interethnic conflict is a multi-level network structure, existing discrepancy in ethno-culture context.
Key wordsinterethnic conflict    social representation    word association test    K-core decomposition
收稿日期: 2018-01-28      出版日期: 2019-01-09
ZTFLH:  N94  
基金资助:中国博士后科学基金第63批面上资助项目(2018M631108);云南省哲学社会科学研究基地课题(JD2017YB04)
通讯作者: 王沛(1970-),男,甘肃天水人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为社会认知、认知神经科学等;韩忠太(1958-),男,山西长子人,学士,教授,主要研究方向为西南少数民族心理人类学。   
作者简介: 胡发稳(1978-),男,云南沾益人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为社会认知、文化心理、群际冲突与合作等。
引用本文:   
胡发稳, 李丽菊, 王沛, 韩忠太. 族际冲突的社会表征:词汇网络分析视角[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 54-61.
HU Fawen, LI Liju, WANG Pei, HAN Zhongtai. Social Representations on Interethnic Conflict: From a Lexical Network Analysis Perspective. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(2): 54-61.
链接本文:  
http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.02.007      或      http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V15/I2/54
[1]林崇德,杨治良,黄希庭.心理学大辞典[Z].上海:上海教育出版社,2004:140.
Lin Chongde,Yang Zhiliang,Huang Xiting.The comprehensive dictionary of psychology[Z].Shanghai:Shanghai Educational Publishing House,2004:140.
[2]英国DK公司.DK·牛津英汉双解大词典(插图版)[Z].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2005.
Dorling Kindersley.DK Oxford illustrated English -Chinese dictionary[Z].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2005.
[3]Guibernau M,Rex J.The Ethnicity Reader:Nationalism,Multiculturalism and Migration[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,2010.
[4]杨仁厚.论民族冲突的影响、原因和消除[J].贵州民族研究,1996,(1):22-29.
Yang Renhou.On the influence,cause and elimination of ethnic conflicts[J].Guizhou Ethnic Studies,1996,(1):22-29.
[5]Yamskov A N.Ethnic conflict in the transcausasus[J].Theory and Society,1991,20(5):631-660.
[6]Leone G,Sarrica M.Challenging the myth of Italians as ‘good fellows’:is clarity about in-group crimes the best choice when narrating a war to its perpetrators’ descendants?[J].Papers on Social Representations,2012,21(2):11.1-11.28.
[7]Roland-Lévy C,Berjot S.Social representations of retirement in France:a descriptive study[J].Applied Psychology,2009,58(3):418-434.
[8]塞尔日·莫斯科维奇.社会表征[M].1版.管健,高文珺,俞容龄,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.
[9]Abric J C.A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction[C]// Farr R,Moscovici S.Social Representations.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1984:169-194.
[10] Guimelli C.Differentiation between the central core elements of social representations:normative vs. functional elements[J].Swiss Journal of Psychology,1998,57(4):209-224.
[11] Moliner P.From central core theory to matrix nucleus theory[J].Papers on Social Representations,2016,(2):1-12.
[12] 林枫,江钟立.网络思维:基于点线符号的认知图式和复杂性范式[J].自然辩证法通讯,2011,33(1):29-35+126.
Lin Feng,Jiang Zhongli.Network thinking:cognitive schemas and complexity paradigm based on symbols of points and lines[J].Journal of Dialectics of Nature,2011,33(1):29-35+126.
[13] Wachelke J.Representations and social knowledge:an integrative effort through a normative structural perspective[J].New Ideas in Psychology,2012,30(2):259-269.
[14] de Nooy W,Mrvar A, Batagelj V.Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek[M].New York,USA:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[15] Lin F,He D,Jin Y,et al.Mapping the central structure core in social representation of pain[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2013,43(9):1931-1945.
[16] 林聚任.社会网络分析:理论、方法与应用[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009.
[17] 林枫.蜘蛛:社会网络分析技术[M].北京:世界图书出版公司北京公司,2012.
[18] 曹震宇,林枫,王蓓蓓.不同性别对“残疾”的社会表征[J].中国康复,2012,27(5):397-400.
Cao Zhenyu,Lin Feng,Wang Beibei.Gender difference in social representation of disability[J].Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation,2012,27(5):397-400.
[19] Sislin J,Pearson F S.Arms and Ethnic Conflict[M].Lanham MD:Rowman & Littlefield,2001.
[20] Wachelke J.Social representations:a review of theory and research from the structural approach[J].Universitas Psychologica, 2011,11(3):729-741.
[21] Wachelke J.Relationship between response evocation rank in social representation associative tasks and personal symbolic value[J].International Review of Social Psychology,2008,21(3):113-126.
[22] Huotilainen A,Tuorila H.Social representation of new foods has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust[J].Food Quality and Preference,2005,16(7):565-572.
[23] Flament C.L'analyse de similitude:une technique pour les recherches sur les représentations sociales[J].Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition,1981,1(4):375-395.
[24] Coronges K A,Stacy A W,Valente T W.Structural comparison of cognitive associative networks in two populations[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2007,37(9):2097-2129.
[25] Abric J C.Central system,peripheral system:their functions and roles in the dynamic of social representations[J].Papers on Social Representations,1993,(2):75-78.
[26] Abric J C.L'organisation interne des representations sociales:système central et système périphérique[C]// Guimelli C.Structures Ettransformations des Représentations Sociales.Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé,1994.
[1] 应尚军, 纪小妹, 吴婷婷. 国际资本流动网络复杂性研究的总体框架[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 38-44.
[2] 周荣荣, 李志勇, 郭非非, 许海玉, 唐仕欢. 补气药人参、黄芪防治心脑疾病的网络药理学研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 18-23.
[3] 潘园园, 张力, 段玲玲, 段法兵. 离散Hopfield神经网络的手写数字识别研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 75-79.
[4] 吴宗柠, 吕俊宇, 蔡宏波, 樊瑛. 双曲空间下国际贸易网络建模与分析——以小麦国际贸易为例[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 31-37.
[5] 贾承丰, 韩华, 完颜娟, 吕亚楠. 基于网络模体特征攻击的网络抗毁性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 43-50.
[6] 郑国庆, 唐清干, 祝光湖. 两层星型网络上的传染病建模和控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 51-57.
[7] 封学军, 张铖, 蒋柳鹏, 张艳, 蒋鹤. “海上丝绸之路”集装箱航运网络路由策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 58-65.
[8] 李云, 宋运忠. 基于混合模式的BA无标度网络同步研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 89-96.
[9] 谭少林, 吕金虎. 复杂网络上的演化博弈动力学——一个计算视角的综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 1-13.
[10] 崔玉美, 陈姗姗, 傅新楚. 几类传染病模型中基本再生数的计算[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 14-31.
[11] 董政呈, 方彦军, 田猛. 相互依存网络抗毁性研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 30-44.
[12] 李沧海, 许益贴, 罗春海, 胡海波. 微博信息扩散的空间分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 75-84.
[13] 黄毅, 张胜, 戴维凯, 王硕, 杨芳. 基于信息维数的加权网络分形特性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 26-33.
[14] 吴晓, 刘万平, 杨武, 卢玲, 刘小洋, 黄诗雯. 新型社交网络谣言传播演化模型研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 34-44.
[15] 刘晓露, 贾书伟, 王建民. 基于Skyline Query的高声誉用户识别方法研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 62-70.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed