Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2016, Vol. 13 Issue (3): 103-107    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2016.03.014
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
附加失败率检验的长距离参考站网模糊度固定
张明1, 刘晖1, 冯彦同2, 周鹏1, 李伟3
1.武汉大学卫星导航定位技术研究中心,武汉 430079;
2.山东省国土测绘院,济南 250102;
3.广西壮族自治区遥感信息测绘院,南宁 530023
Ambiguity Resolution for Long-Range Reference Station Network with Additional Failure Probability Test
ZHANG Ming1, LIU Hui1, FENG Yantong2, ZHOU Peng1, LI Wei3
1. GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Shandong Provincial Institute of Land Surveying and Mapping, Jinan 250102, China;
3. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Remote Sensing Surveying and Mapping Institute, Nanning 530023, China
全文: PDF(713 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 对于长距离参考站网模糊度固定而言,Ratio检验和三角形模糊度闭合差(Triangle Ambiguities Closure Error,TACE)检验是最常用的两种模糊度检验手段,一般认为通过这两种检验后即可将模糊度固定。但事实上,在此情况下,模糊度被错误固定的情况经常出现。为此,本文提出了一种网解失败率(Network Failure Probability,NFP)检验方法,使用该方法可以计算出通过Ratio检验和TACE检验前提下参考站网模糊度固定的失败率。实验表明,当参考站数量小于等于8时,附加NFP检验后模糊度固定的正确率最高提高了25.4%,平均提高了8.1%,初始化成功率平均提高了4.3%。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张明
刘晖
冯彦同
周鹏
李伟
关键词 失败率长距离参考站网模糊度固定模糊度检验    
Abstract:Ratio and triangle ambiguities closure error (TACE) tests are two primary validation methods used in ambiguity resolution for long-range reference station network. once they are passed, it is considered the ambiguities could be fixed to integers with a high confidence. However, it is usually found that the ambiguities were wrongly fixed even both the two tests above are passed. To improve the correct rate of ambiguity solutions, we proposed a network failure probability (NFP) test, the failure probability of the reference station network is calculated under the conditions of that the Ratio test and TACE test have been passed. The experiment result shows that, with additional NFP test, the average correct rate of integer ambiguity solutions is raised up by 8.1% with a peak at 23.5%, the average initialization speed is increased by 5.6% as well when the number of the reference stations is smaller than 8.
Key wordsfailure probability    long-range    reference station network    ambiguity resolution    ambiguity test
收稿日期: 2014-05-20      出版日期: 2025-02-25
ZTFLH:  N94  
基金资助:国科发高资助项目([2012]38);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目(2012AA12A209);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目(2007AA12Z309)
通讯作者: 于洪洁(1968-),女,辽宁大连人,副教授,博士研究生,主要研究方向为复杂系统非线性动力学,混沌同步与控制。   
作者简介: 张明(1989-),男,湖北仙桃人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为长距离网络RTK理论与方法。
引用本文:   
张明, 刘晖, 冯彦同, 周鹏, 李伟. 附加失败率检验的长距离参考站网模糊度固定[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13(3): 103-107.
ZHANG Ming, LIU Hui, FENG Yantong, ZHOU Peng, LI Wei. Ambiguity Resolution for Long-Range Reference Station Network with Additional Failure Probability Test[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13(3): 103-107.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2016.03.014      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V13/I3/103
[1] Euler H J, Schaffrin B. On a measure for the discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS-mode[C].International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 1991, 107: 285-295.
[2] Teunissen P J G, Verhagen S. The GNSS ambiguity ratio-test revisited: a better way of using it[J].Survey Review, 2009, 41(312):138-151.
[3] 武晓波,王世新,肖春生. Delaunay三角网的生成算法研究[J].测绘学报,1999,28(1):28-35.
Wu XiaoBo, Wang ShiXin, Xiao ChunSheng. A new study of Delaunay triangulation creation[J].Acta Geodaetica et Cartographic Sinica, 1999, 28(1): 28-35.
[4] 张明,刘晖,候祥祥,等. 一种用于长距离网络RTK基准站模糊度固定的非组合方法[J].测绘科学技术学报,2015,32(1):32-41.
Zhang Ming, Liu Hui, Hou XiangXiang, et al. Base stations’ ambiguity resolution of long-range network RTK based on uncombined method[J].Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 2015, 32(1): 32-41.
[5] 魏子卿,葛茂荣. GPS相对定位的数学模型[M].北京:测绘出版社,1998:56-85.
[6] Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, et al. Global mapping function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on data from numerical weather model data[J].Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33:L07304.
[7] Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, et al. Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations[J].Journal of Geodesy, 2008, 82:389-399.
[8] Dong D, Bock Y. Global positioning system network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94(B4):3949-3966.
[9] Teunissen P J G. Success probability of integer GPS ambiguity rounding and bootstrapping[J].Journal of Geodesy, 1998, 72(10):606-612.
[10] Teunissen P J G. The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation[J].Journal of Geodesy, 1995, 70(1):65-82.
[11] Liu J N, Ge M R. PANDA Software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination[J].Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2003, 8(2):603-609.
[1] 马忠渝, 程言欣, 陈李燊, 廖启嘉, 钱江海. 基于适应度有序准入策略的网络凝聚调控[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 6-12.
[2] 张玉玺, 孙小淇. 概周期驱动二维正弦系统的奇异非混沌吸引子特性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 53-57.
[3] 吴聪玲, 吴召艳. 带耦合时滞的分数阶社团网络的聚类滞后同步[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 1-5.
[4] 王筱莉, 张静, 陈淑琴, 钱梦迪. 基于社交网络的舆情多信息交互传播机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 38-45.
[5] 汤淼, 范宏. 具有CDS的动态多层网络银行系统性风险研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 55-61.
[6] 周斌, 马福祥, 高淑洁, 马秀娟, 李明杰. 超边内部结构对无标度超网络鲁棒性的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 1-8.
[7] 张成军, 姚辉, 雷毅, 夏登辉, 李琪, 沈鑫禹, 钱铭, 余文斌. 高低阶耦合网络的鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 17-22.
[8] 马佳骏, 勾文沙, 李小萌, 史毅, 肖明忠, 陈清华. “一带一路”沿线国家的人口迁移及其演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 23-29.
[9] 戴剑勇, 甘美艳, 张美荣, 毛佳志, 刘朝. 基于复杂网络的天然气管道网络风险传播研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 69-76.
[10] 廖阳, 孟豪南, 李迎峰, 李思卿. 需求变动视角下虚拟养老服务人员调度研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 144-153.
[11] 吴洁, 谢小东, 盛永祥, 桂亮. 创新联合体潜在合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 104-111.
[12] 卢周来, 孟斌斌, 吴伟韬, 赵晶, 戚刚, 赵扬帆. 复杂性科学视角下的金融研究新进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 1-14.
[13] 刘建刚, 陈芦霞. 突发事件下粮食股市的抗毁性及预警研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 52-59.
[14] 侯喜妹, 王高峡, 杨帆, 王怡珂. 有向加权网络的重要模体识别及其应用[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 38-44.
[15] 孙威威, 张峥. 基于复杂网络的电动汽车创新扩散博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 45-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed