Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2017, Vol. 14 Issue (1): 1-7    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2017.01.001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
空间脆弱性与传统网络属性的关系
李航, 胡小兵, 郭晓梅, 史培军
北京师范大学 a.减灾与应急管理研究院;b.地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875
Relationship Between Spatial Vulnerability and Traditional Network Properties
LI Hang, HU Xiaobing, GUO Xiaomei, SHI Peijun
a. Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management,b. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Process and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
全文: PDF(1358 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为探索研究网络系统脆弱性的新思路,并进一步提升空间脆弱性模型的实用性,分析了空间脆弱性与传统网络属性(主要是平均最短路径,平均中间性,连通性和受影响最短路径数目)的关系,并以北京地铁网络为例验证这一关系。结果表明`,在网络系统脆弱性研究中,当重点关注空间灾害对系统造成的全局性影响时,新的空间脆弱性模型和传统网络属性的合理结合可以提供一种行之有效的方法。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李航
胡小兵
郭晓梅
史培军
关键词 网络系统网络属性空间脆弱性地铁网络    
Abstract:To explore a new thinking for network vulnerability research, and improve the practicality of spatial vulnerability model, this paper analyzes the relationship between spatial vulnerability and four traditional network properties, average shortest path, average betweenness, connectivity and amount of impacted shortest paths, and conducts a case study on Beijing′s subway network to verify this relationship. The results show that, when the global impact of spatial hazards is concerned in network vulnerability research, the reasonable combination of the new spatial vulnerability model and traditional network properties can deliver an effective approach.
Key wordsnetwork system    network properties    spatial vulnerability    subway network
收稿日期: 2015-11-09      出版日期: 2025-02-24
ZTFLH:  N94  
  X43  
基金资助:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB955404); 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(41321001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2013NT19)
作者简介: 李航(1989-),男,陕西岐山人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为复杂系统风险和安全。
引用本文:   
李航, 胡小兵, 郭晓梅, 史培军. 空间脆弱性与传统网络属性的关系[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(1): 1-7.
LI Hang, HU Xiaobing, GUO Xiaomei, SHI Peijun. Relationship Between Spatial Vulnerability and Traditional Network Properties[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2017, 14(1): 1-7.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2017.01.001      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2017/V14/I1/1
[1] Palla G, Derenyi I, Farkas I, et al. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society[J].Nature,2005,435(9): 814-818.
[2] Barabasi A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks[J].Science,1999,286: 509-512.
[3] 罗赟骞,汤锦辉,赵钟磊,等. 中国航空交通网络时变和多层次特性分析[J].复杂系统和复杂性科学,2014,11(4):4-9.
Luo Yunqian, Tang Jinhui, Zhao Zhonglei, et. al. Analysis of Chinese airport network’s time-varing and multi-layered features[J].Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2014,11(4):4-9.
[4] 孟仲伟,鲁宗相,宋靖雁. 中美电网的小世界拓扑模型比较分析[J].电力系统自动化,2004,25(15):21-24.
Meng Zhongwei, Lu Zongxiang, Song Jingyan. Comparison analysis of the small-world topological model of Chinese and American power grids[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2004,25(15):21-24.
[5] 刘业政,周云龙. 无尺度网络平均路径长度的估计[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(6):1566-1571.
Liu Yezheng, Zhou Yunlong. Estimation for the average path length of scale-free networks[J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014,34(6):1566-1571.
[6] Mazzocchi M, Hansstein F, Ragona M. The 2010 volcanic ash cloud and its financial impact on the European airline industry[J]//CESifo Forum. 2010,11(2): 92-100.
[7] 杨露萍,钱大琳. 道路交通网络脆弱性研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2011,12(2):105-110.
Yang LuPing, Qian DaLin. Vulnerability analysis of road networks[J].Joural of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2011,12(2):105-110.
[8] Liu H, Hu X B, Yang S N, et.al. Application of complex network theory and genetic algorithm in airline route networks[J].Transportation Research Record,2011,2214: 50-58.
[9] 许凤,朱金福,苗建军. 基于复杂网络的空铁符合网络的鲁棒性研究[J].复杂系统和复杂性科学,2015,12(1):1-6.
Xu Feng, Zhu JinFu, Miao JianJun. The robustness of high-speed railway and civil aviation compound network based on the complex network theory[J].Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2015,12(1):1-6.
[10] 王志强,李欣,李岩,等. 基于复杂网络与风险的电网综合脆弱性评估[J].现代电力,2014,31(3):49-55.
Wang ZhiQiang, Li Xin, Li Yan,et al. Comprehensive vulnerability evaluation of power grid based on complex network and risk theory[J].Modern Electric Power, 2014,31(3):49-55.
[11] 尹洪英,徐丽群. 道路交通网络脆弱性评估研究现状与展望[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(3):7-13.
Yin HongYing, Xu LiQun. Vulnerability assessment of transportation road networks[J].Joural of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2010,10(3):7-13.
[12] 叶青. 基于复杂网络理论的轨道交通网络脆弱性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(2):122-126.
Ye Qing. Vulnerability analysis of rail transit based on complex network theory[J].China Safety Science Joural, 2012,22(2):122-126.
[13] Wollmer R. Removing arcs from a network[J].Operation research,1964,12(6): 934-940.
[14] Corley H W, Sha D Y. Most vital links and nodes in weighted networks[J].Operations Research Letters,1982,1(4):157-160.
[15] Grubesic T H, O'Kelly M E, Murray A T. A geographic perspective on commercial Internet survivability[J].Telematics & Informatics, 2003, 20(1):51-69.
[16] Murray A T, Matisziw T C, Grubesic T H. Critical network infrastructure analysis: interdiction and system flow[J].Journal of Geographical Systems,2007,9(2): 103-117.
[17] Helbing D. Globally networked risks and how to respond[J].Nature,2013,497: 51-59.
[18] 李航,郭晓梅,许珍,等. 空间局域性灾害下网络系统的空间脆弱性研究[J].自然灾害学报,2015,24(6):19-32.
Li Hang, Guo XiaoMei, Xu Zhen, et al. Research on spatial vulnerability of network systems under spatially local hazards[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2015,24(6):19-32.
[19] 李鹤,张平宇,程叶青. 脆弱性的概念及其评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):18-25.
Li He, Zhang PingYu, Chen YeQing. Concepts and assessment methods of vulnerability[J].Progress in Geography, 2008,27(2):18-25.
[20] Strihou J P V Y D. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, summary for policymakers[M]//Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001.
[21] Cutter S L, Boruff B J, Shirley W L. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards[J].Social Science Quarterly,2003,84(2): 242-261.
[22] Shi P, Ning L I, Qian Y E, et al. Research on global environmental change and integrated disaster risk governance[J].Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 24(4):428-435.
[1] 张玉玺, 孙小淇. 概周期驱动二维正弦系统的奇异非混沌吸引子特性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 53-57.
[2] 马忠渝, 程言欣, 陈李燊, 廖启嘉, 钱江海. 基于适应度有序准入策略的网络凝聚调控[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 6-12.
[3] 吴聪玲, 吴召艳. 带耦合时滞的分数阶社团网络的聚类滞后同步[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 1-5.
[4] 王筱莉, 张静, 陈淑琴, 钱梦迪. 基于社交网络的舆情多信息交互传播机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 38-45.
[5] 汤淼, 范宏. 具有CDS的动态多层网络银行系统性风险研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 55-61.
[6] 周斌, 马福祥, 高淑洁, 马秀娟, 李明杰. 超边内部结构对无标度超网络鲁棒性的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 1-8.
[7] 张成军, 姚辉, 雷毅, 夏登辉, 李琪, 沈鑫禹, 钱铭, 余文斌. 高低阶耦合网络的鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 17-22.
[8] 马佳骏, 勾文沙, 李小萌, 史毅, 肖明忠, 陈清华. “一带一路”沿线国家的人口迁移及其演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 23-29.
[9] 戴剑勇, 甘美艳, 张美荣, 毛佳志, 刘朝. 基于复杂网络的天然气管道网络风险传播研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 69-76.
[10] 廖阳, 孟豪南, 李迎峰, 李思卿. 需求变动视角下虚拟养老服务人员调度研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 144-153.
[11] 吴洁, 谢小东, 盛永祥, 桂亮. 创新联合体潜在合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 104-111.
[12] 侯喜妹, 王高峡, 杨帆, 王怡珂. 有向加权网络的重要模体识别及其应用[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 38-44.
[13] 孙威威, 张峥. 基于复杂网络的电动汽车创新扩散博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 45-51.
[14] 卢周来, 孟斌斌, 吴伟韬, 赵晶, 戚刚, 赵扬帆. 复杂性科学视角下的金融研究新进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 1-14.
[15] 刘建刚, 陈芦霞. 突发事件下粮食股市的抗毁性及预警研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 52-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed