Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2024, Vol. 21 Issue (4): 115-125    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.04.017
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
外包平台任务匹配博弈:量子化策略研究
张喜征, 刘阳, 丁笑音
湖南大学工商管理学院,长沙 410082
Task Matching Game in Outsourcing Platform: a Quantized Strategy
ZHANG Xizheng, LIU Yang, DING Xiaoyin
School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
全文: PDF(1379 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为解决任务外包中匹配不精准、委托代理间信任度低以及“跳单”等问题,运用量子博弈方法,以量子化过程扩张参与者策略空间,通过累积分布函数处理为贴近度形式描述了任务匹配“纠缠”,研究发现在最低能级状态达成时对各参与方具有pareto均衡解。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张喜征
刘阳
丁笑音
关键词 外包平台任务匹配量子博弈量子纠缠    
Abstract:To address issues such as poor matching, low trust between principal agents, and jump-dealing in task outsourcing, quantum game methods are used to expand the participant strategy space through a quantization process. The task matching "entanglement" is described in the form of closeness degree by processing the cumulative distribution function, and a pareto equilibrium solution for each participant is achieved at the lowest energy level state.
Key wordsoutsourcing platform    task matching    quantum gaming    quantum entanglement
收稿日期: 2023-01-12      出版日期: 2025-01-03
ZTFLH:  F224  
  O221  
基金资助:教育部人文社会科学规划基金(21YJA630115);国家自然科学基金(71571066)
作者简介: 张喜征(1968-),男,湖南株洲人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为知识管理、信息管理、供应链管理。
引用本文:   
张喜征, 刘阳, 丁笑音. 外包平台任务匹配博弈:量子化策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 115-125.
ZHANG Xizheng, LIU Yang, DING Xiaoyin. Task Matching Game in Outsourcing Platform: a Quantized Strategy[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2024, 21(4): 115-125.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.04.017      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I4/115
[1] 李志鹏, 黄河. 考虑再谈判的网上服务采购多属性拍卖研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 184-195.
LI Z P, HUANG H. Multi-attribute auctions for online services procurement considering renegotiation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12): 184-195.
[2] 李美苓, 林健. 第三方电子商务平台与加盟商家联盟稳定性的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(3): 1-9.
LI M L, LIN J. Alliance stability between third-party e-commerce platform and cooperative merchant based on evolutionary games[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(3): 1-9.
[3] 郑小碧,庞春,刘俊哲.数字经济时代的外包转型与经济高质量发展——分工演进的超边际分析[J].中国工业经济,2020(7):117-135.
ZHENG X B, PANG C, LIU J Z. Structural changes in outsourcing and high-quality economic development in the digital era——an inframarginal analysis to the division of labor[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2020(7): 117-135.
[4] 范如国. 平台技术赋能、公共博弈与复杂适应性治理[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(12): 131-152,202.
FAN R G. Platform technology enabling, public gaming and complex adaptive governance[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2021(12): 131-152,202.
[5] ALIMUDIN A, ISHIDA Y. Matching-updating mechanism: a solution for the stable marriage problem with dynamic preferences[J]. Entropy, 2022, 24(2): 263.
[6] 李松, 袁安琪. 考虑直觉模糊的多指标人岗双边匹配决策方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(12): 304-309.
LI S, YUAN A Q. Method for two-sided matching about personal- job based on multiple criteria considering intuitionistic fuzzy[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2022, 58(12): 304-309.
[7] YU D, XU Z. Intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching model and its application to personnel-position matching problems[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2020, 71(2): 312-321.
[8] GALE D, SHAPLEY L S. College admissions and the stability of marriage[J]. The American Mathematical Monthly, 1962, 69(1): 9-15.
[9] 樊治平, 李铭洋, 乐琦. 考虑稳定匹配条件的双边满意匹配决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 112-118.
FAN Z P, LI M Y, LE Q. Decision Analysis Method for Two-Sided Satisfied Matching Considering Stable Matching Condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 112-118.
[10] HAłABURDA H. Unravelling in two-sided matching markets and similarity of preferences[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2010, 69(2): 365-393.
[11] DELARAM J, HOUSHAMAND M, ASHTIANI F, et al. A utility-based matching mechanism for stable and optimal resource allocation in cloud manufacturing platforms using deferred acceptance algorithm[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 60: 569-584.
[12] 樊治平, 乐琦. 基于完全偏好序信息的严格双边匹配方法[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(1): 21-34.
FAN Z P, LE Q. Strict two-sided matching method based on complete preference ordinal information[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2014, 17(1): 21-34.
[13] 郭嘉宇, 付晓东, 岳昆, 等. 偏好匹配满意度最大化的众包任务分配[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2022, 44(1): 16-26.
GUO J Y, FU X D, YUE K, et al. Task allocation of crowdsourcing for maximizing Satisfaction with preference matching [J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2022, 44(1): 16-26.
[14] FAN Z P, ZHANG X, LIU Y, et al. A method for stochastic multiple attribute decision making based on concepts of ideal and anti-ideal points[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2013, 219(24): 11438-11450.
[15] QIN X, YANG H, WU Y, et al. Multi-party ride-matching problem in the ride-hailing market with bundled option services[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 131: 103287.
[16] WANG X, AGATZ N, ERERA A. Stable matching for dynamic ride-sharing systems[J]. Transportation Science, 2018, 52(4): 850-867.
[17] 熊新生, 何琨, 赵勇. 弱偏好序下存在租客的房屋匹配问题机制设计[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2014(9): 1140-1155.
XIONG X S, HE K, ZHAO Y. Mechanism design for the house allocation problem with indifferent houses and existing tenants [J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2014(9): 1140-1155.
[18] MEYER D A. Quantum strategies[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 82(5): 1052.
[19] EISERT J, WILKENS M, LEWENSTEIN M. Quantum games and quantum strategies[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 83(15): 3077.
[20] MARINATTO L, WEBER T. A quantum approach to static games of complete information[J]. Physics Letters A, 2000, 272(5/6): 291-303.
[21] IQBAL A, TOOR A H. Quantum mechanics gives stability to a Nash equilibrium[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(2): 022306.
[22] FRACKIEWICZ P. A comment on the generalization of the Marinatto-Weber quantum game scheme[DB/OL].[2022-11-11]. http://doi.org/10.5506/arXiv.1303.4019.
[23] 张新立, 田英楠, 王嘉琪. 基于异质预期的量子伯川德博弈复杂动力机制分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6):56-60.
ZHANG X L, TIAN Y N, WANG J Q. Complex dynamics analysis of a quantum bertrand duopoly model with heterogeneous expectations[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(6):56-60.
[24] IQBAL A, TOOR A H. Backwards-induction outcome in a quantum game[J]. Physical Review A, 2002, 65(5): 052328.
[25] FRACKIEWICZ P, SŁADKOWSKI J. Quantum information approach to the ultimatum game[J]. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2014, 53(10): 3248-3261.
[26] VYAS N, BENJAMIN C. Is the essence of a quantum game captured completely in the original classical game?[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021, 584: 126360.
[27] ERYGANOV I, HRDINA J. Complex Clifford algebra in repeated quantum prisoner′s dilemma[J]. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3):65-77.
[28] LEGÓN A R, MEDINA E. Dilemma breaking in quantum games by joint probabilities approach[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1-13.
[29] CONSUELO-LEAL A, ARAUJO-FERREIRA A G, LUCAS-OLIVEIRA E, et al. Pareto-optimal solution for the quantum battle of the sexes[J]. Quantum Information Processing, 2020, 19(2): 1-21.
[30] 崔铁军, 李莎莎. 系统故障演化过程最终事件状态及发生概率研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(8): 1-7.
CUI T J, LI S S. Study on target event state and occurrence probability of system fault evolution process [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(8): 1-7.
[31] 张有中. 双渠道供应链定价的量子博奕[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(5): 145-153.
ZHANG Y Z. Quantum game in dual-channel supply chain[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(5): 145-153.
[32] 贺一堂, 谢富纪. 基于量子博弈的产学研协同创新激励机制研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(6): 1435-1448.
HE Y T, XIE F J. Research on the incentive mechanism of the industry-university-institute collaborative innovation based on the quantum game theory[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(6): 1435-1448.
[33] 李永海, 樊治平. 电子中介中考虑第三方评价的多属性商品交易匹配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 184-195.
LI Y H, FAN Z P. Method for multiple-attributes trade matching considering evaluations of the third-party in E-brokerag[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(7): 184-195.
[34] 林杨, 王应明. 不确定偏好序下的双边匹配博弈[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24(1): 155-162.
LIN Y, WANG Y M. Two-sided game matching with uncertain preference or dinal[J]. Operations Research Transactions, 2020, 24(1): 155-162.
[35] CHEN Y W, WANG C H, LIN S J. A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport[J]. Omega, 2008, 36(3): 363-372.
[36] 吴剑云, 张嵩. 基于电子中介的软件外包交易匹配模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(7): 1593-1601.
WU J Y, ZHANG S. Transaction matching model of software outsourcing based on electronic brokerage[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 23(7): 1593-1601.
[1] 许海娟, 叶春明, 李芳. 碳减排成本分担下的供应链运营决策分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 81-90.
[2] 彭伟华, 侯仁勇. 网络平台就业治理的三方演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 99-106.
[3] 马明扬, 杨洪勇, 刘飞. 基于强化学习的双人博弈差分隐私保护研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 107-114.
[4] 谢振雨, 万安霞. 药品安全治理演化博弈及策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 129-136.
[5] 杨国忠, 周午阳. 基于供应链视角的企业协同生态创新演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 120-128.
[6] 张骥骧, 陈晓竹. 考虑氮素流通效率的生态补偿策略演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(2): 90-97.
[7] 李超然, 刘举胜, 宋美, 韩景倜, 于长锐. 演化博弈视角下的医患关系分析及对策研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(3): 44-54.
[8] 邓云生, 张纪会. 基于分组选择的可调聚类网络中个体的合作行为研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 39-44.
[9] 李军涛, 刘朋飞, 胡启贤. 模糊环境下考虑公平偏好的绿色供应链博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(4): 84-94.
[10] 全吉, 周亚文, 王先甲. 社会困境博弈中群体合作行为演化研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(1): 1-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed