Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2020, Vol. 17 Issue (2): 86-92    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2020.02.010
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于患者动态知识搜索的医生过度医疗行为研究
芮晨1, 2, 张胜发3, 陶富1, 张维军3, 田东华3
1. 河北工业大学,天津 300400;
2. 沧州市中心医院,河北 沧州 061001;
3. 北京师范大学,北京 100875;
4.河北大学,河北 保定 071002
The Physician Over-Rreatment Behavior Based on Patient’s Knowledge Dynamic Search
RUI Chen1, 2, ZHANG Shengfa3, TAO Fu1, ZHANG Weijun3, TIAN Donghua3
1. Hebei University of technology, Tianjin 300400, China; 2. Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou 061001, China;
3. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;4. Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
全文: PDF(945 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 医患信息不对称导致的过度医疗是中国医疗费用过快上涨的最根本原因之一。首先构建患者静态搜索知识策略下医生与患者的演化博弈模型;进一步引入患者动态搜索知识策略,并对医生和患者选择行为进行分析,最后对影响医生和患者行为选择的因素进行了讨论。结果表明患者静态搜索知识策略下不存在演化稳定策略;患者动态搜索知识时,存在唯一的演化稳定点。从而得出的结论是降低单位知识搜寻成本,提高单位知识的有效性,增强医生过度医疗时声誉损失系数,均能有效促进医生合理医疗;对于能力水平不高及过度医疗程度较小的医生群体,患者应更加注意其诊疗行为;监管机构应对医疗费用可增加空间较小的疾病进行重点监管。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
芮晨
张胜发
陶富
张维军
田东华
关键词 过度医疗演化博弈患者动态知识搜索    
Abstract:In order to provide a decision-making reference for physician over-treatment problems, the study established an evolutionary game model based on the game relationship between physician and patient. The result showed that there is no evolutionary stable strategy under the patient's static search knowledge strategy and there is a unique evolutionary stable strategy when the patient dynamically searches for knowledge. As the main conclusions, improving the effectiveness of knowledge in the unit, and increasing the reputational loss coefficient for physician's over-treatment behavior are effective manners to reduce the cost of knowledge search for a unit. The behavior of the physician group which has a lower ability and adopts a smaller degree of over-treatment should be paid more attentions. The focus of supervision should be on diseases with less room for growth of medical expenses.
Key wordsover-treatment    evolutionary game    knowledge dynamic search
     出版日期: 2020-06-24
ZTFLH:  R197.1  
基金资助:国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFB2101100)
通讯作者: 张胜发(1986),男,河北邢台人,博士,主要研究方向为医院管理、健康大数据、精神卫生、医疗卫生政策等。   
作者简介: 芮晨(1987),男,河北邢台人,博士,主要研究方向为医院管理和医疗大数据挖掘与分析。
引用本文:   
芮晨, 张胜发, 陶富, 张维军, 田东华. 基于患者动态知识搜索的医生过度医疗行为研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(2): 86-92.
RUI Chen, ZHANG Shengfa, TAO Fu, ZHANG Weijun, TIAN Donghua. The Physician Over-Rreatment Behavior Based on Patient’s Knowledge Dynamic Search. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(2): 86-92.
链接本文:  
http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2020.02.010      或      http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V17/I2/86
[1]Access GBDH, Quality Collaborators. Electronic address cue, Access GBDH, Quality C. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 19902015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 390(10091):231266.
[2]Hu S L, Tang S L, Liu Y L, et al. Health system reform in China 6 reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities[J]. Lancet 2008, 372(9652):18461853.
[3]Fullman N, Yearwood J, Abay S M, et al. Measuring performance on the healthcare access and quality index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2016[J]. Lancet 2018, 391(10136):22362271.
[4]国家卫生健康委员会. 中国卫生健康统计年鉴(2018)[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社; 2018.
[5]陈钊, 刘晓峰, 汪汇. 服务价格市场化:中国医疗卫生体制改革的未尽之路[J]. 管理世界, 2008(8):5258.
Chen Zhao,Liu Xiaofeng, Wang Hui. The marketization of service prices: the ensuing way the reform of China's medical system has to carve[J].Management World, 2008, 8:1422.
[6]Chen Z. Launch of the health-care reform plan in China[J]. Lancet 2009, 373(9672):13221324.
[7]袁迎春. “看病难、看病贵”的话语变迁:19782012——以《人民日报》为例[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 45(2):236244.
Yuan Yingchun. Discourse changes of "difficult medical treatment" and "high medical espense":1978—2012—evidence from people's daily[J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University(hum & soc sci), 2017, 45(2):236244.
[8]张羽, 张晓芬. 我国医疗费用不合理上升的原因探析——基于信息不对称视角[J].科技与企业 2014(1):1518.
Zhang Yu, Zhang Xiaofen . Analysis on medical costs irrationally rising: based on the perspective of asymmetric information[J]. Journal of Technology and Enterprise, 2014(1):1518.
[9]朱继武. 信息不对称对我国医疗费用增长影响的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践,2015(12):7779.
Zhu Jiwu, An analysis of the impact of information asymmetry on the growth of medical expenses in China[J]. Price:Theory & Practice, 2015, 12:7779.
[10] 刘军强, 刘凯, 曾益. 医疗费用持续增长机制——基于历史数据和田野资料的分析[J]. 中国社会科学 2015(8):104125+206207.
Liu Junqiang, Liu Kai, Zeng Yi. The source of constantly rising health care costs: an analysis is based on historical data and field materials[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2015, 8: 104125 ,206207.
[11] 马妍, 樊宏, 吉华萍, 等. 后医改时代我国过度医疗行为的多维度审视[J]. 卫生软科学, 2014, 28(3):131133.
Ma Yan, Fan Hong, Ji Huaping, et al. Multiple dimensions survey on overtreatment behaviour in later medical reform age[J]. Soft Science of Health, 2014, 28(3):131133.
[12] 吕俊兴, Andrew Y, 吕英义. 基于数学模型的医患问题研究. 数理医药学杂志[J]. 2017, 30(10):14261428.
Lü Junxing, Andrew Y, Lü Yingyi. Study on doctor-patient problem based on mathematical models[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2017, 30(10):14261428.
[13] Pitchik C, Schotter A. Honesty in a model of strategic information-transmission[J]. American Economic Review 1987, 77(5):10321036.
[14] Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R. On doctors, mechanics and computer specialists-the economics of credence goods[J]. Social Ence Electronic Publishing, 2005,44(1): 542.
[15] Alger I, Salanié F. A theory of fraud and overtreatment in experts markets[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 2010, 15(4):853881.
[16] Benjamin D, Iztok H, Ioannidis J P A. Modern health care as a game theory problem[J]. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2015, 45(1):112.
[17] Olivella P, Siciliani L. Reputational concerns with altruistic providers[J]. J Health Econ, 2017, 55:113.
[18] 黄涛, 颜涛. 医疗信任商品的信号博弈分析[J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(8):125134.
Huang Tao, Yan Tao. Signal game analysis of medical trust goods[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2009, 44 (8): 125134.
[19] 宋之杰, 郭燕平, 吉增良, 等. 分级诊疗下二三级医院服务资源整合的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2018, 11(2):4451.
Song Zhijie, Guo Yanping, Ji Zengliang, et al. Evolutionary game of resources integration on secondary hospital and tertiary hospital in tiered medical care system[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2018, 11 (2): 4451.
[20] 王文娟, 王季冬. 过度医疗与转诊制:一个排队论下的博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2019, 22(2):6376.
Wang Wenjuan, Wang Jidong. Overtreatment and referral systems: a game embedded in a queuing model[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2019, 22 (2): 6376.
[1] 王桂林, 徐勇. 带攻击玩家的演化拥塞博弈的鲁棒性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(2): 47-53.
[2] 全吉, 周亚文, 王先甲. 社会困境博弈中群体合作行为演化研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(1): 1-14.
[3] 章平, 黄傲霜, 罗宏维. 不同类型复杂网络中个体合作行为互动的演化博弈模拟[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(3): 60-70.
[4] 李春发, 王学敏, 来茜茜, 薛楠楠. “互联网+”手机回收模式缘何绩效不彰?——基于mABM的演化博弈仿真分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 63-73.
[5] 苏雪, 徐勇, 樊旭娇. 切换拓扑企业创新时滞演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 54-62.
[6] 李杰, 张睿, 徐勇. 虚假口碑信息控制演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 39-46.
[7] 肖琴, 罗帆. 机场外来物风险监管策略的演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 18-25.
[8] 武利琴, 王金环, 徐勇. 一种基于半张量积的多层网络演化博弈方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 68-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed