Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2023, Vol. 20 Issue (4): 1-9    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2023.04.001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社会集群行为中观点极化研究进展——以偏见同化和敌意媒体效应为中心
肖人彬1, 张轩宇2
1.华中科技大学人工智能与自动化学院,武汉 430074;
2.香港理工大学航空及民航工程学系,香港 999077
Research Progress of Opinion Polarization in Social Collective Behavior: Centered on Biased Assimilation and the Hostile Media Effects
XIAO Renbin, ZHANG Xuanyu
1. School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
全文: PDF(1116 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 观点极化现象作为社会系统中的一种集群行为,会对社会稳定产生重大影响,据此对观点极化研究现状进行系统性的梳理和总结。在回顾社会与政治领域中的观点极化概念和建模研究的基础上,提炼出导致观点极化的两种观点交互方式。从个体视角出发,重点探讨两种可能导致观点极化的社会心理效应——偏见同化和敌意媒体效应。提出不同领域的极化现象研究整合的关键在于个体观点或态度变化的内在机制。在研究展望中指出今后研究的重点之一是模型与现实数据的相互印证。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
肖人彬
张轩宇
关键词 集群行为观点极化偏见同化敌意媒体效应    
Abstract:As a type of collective behavior in social systems, opinion polarization may greatly influence social stability. Thus, this paper systematically sorts out and summarizes the research status of opinion polarization. Based on reviews of the concept and modeling of opinion polarization in social and political fields, the two interaction mechanisms of opinions that lead to opinion polarization are extracted. From the perspective of individuals, the paper focuses on discussion two kinds of social psychological effects that may lead to opinion polarization, viz., biased assimilation and hostile media effect. The key to integration of polarization research in different fields lies in the internal change mechanism of individual opinion. One of the emphasis in future research should focus on the mutual corroboration of models and real data.
Key wordscollective behavior    opinion polarization    biased assimilation    hostile media effect
收稿日期: 2022-11-13      出版日期: 2023-12-28
ZTFLH:  G206  
基金资助:科技创新2030—“新一代人工智能”重大项目(2018AAA0101200);国家自然科学基金(71974063)
作者简介: 肖人彬(1965-),男,湖北武汉人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为复杂系统、群体智能。
引用本文:   
肖人彬, 张轩宇. 社会集群行为中观点极化研究进展——以偏见同化和敌意媒体效应为中心[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 1-9.
XIAO Renbin, ZHANG Xuanyu. Research Progress of Opinion Polarization in Social Collective Behavior: Centered on Biased Assimilation and the Hostile Media Effects. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2023, 20(4): 1-9.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2023.04.001      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I4/1
[1] DEUTSCH A, FRIEDL P, PREZIOSI L, et al. Multi-scale analysis and modelling of collective migration in biological systems[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2020, 375(1807): 20190377.
[2] YANG Q, LIBERALI P. Collective behaviours in organoids[J]. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2021, 72: 81-90.
[3] 肖人彬. 群集智能特性分析及其对复杂系统研究的意义[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2006, 3(3): 10-19.
XIAO R B. Analysis of characteristics of swam intelligence and its significance to the research of complex systems[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2006, 3(3): 10-19.
[4] THERAULAZ G, BONABEAU E. Modelling the collective building of complex architectures in social insects with lattice swarms[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1995, 177(4): 381-400.
[5] KUNZ H, HEMELRIJK C K. Artificial fish schools: collective effects of school size, body size, and body form[J]. Artificial Life, 2003, 9(3): 237-253.
[6] NISHIMURA S I, IKEGAMI T. Emergence of collective strategies in a prey-predator game model[J]. Artificial Life, 1997, 3(4): 243-260.
[7] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C, SHI Y H. Swarm Intelligence[M]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001.
[8] CHASE I D. Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: a comparative perspective[J]. American Sociological Review, 1980, 45(6): 905-924.
[9] BECKER J, BRACKBILL D, CENTOLA D. Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(26): 5070-5076.
[10] CASTELLANO C, FORTUNATO S, LORETO V. Statistical physics of social dynamics[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2009, 81(2): 591-646.
[11] 刘举胜, 何建佳, 韩景倜, 等. 观点动力学研究现状及进展述评[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(2): 9-20.
LIU J S, HE J J, HAN J T, et al. A review of the research status and progress of opinion dynamics[J], Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2021, 18(2): 9-20.
[12] DEGROOT M H. Reaching a consensus[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, 69(345): 118-121.
[13] HEGSELMANN R, KRAUSE U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation[J]. Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, 5(3): 2.
[14] XING Y, WANG X, QIU C, et al. Research on opinion polarization by big data analytics capabilities in online social networks[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 68: 101902.
[15] 夏倩芳, 原永涛. 从群体极化到公众极化:极化研究的进路与转向[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2017, 24(6): 5-32.
XIA Q F, YUAN Y T. From group polarization to public polarization: the approach and turn of polarization research[J]. Journalism and Communication, 2017, 24(6): 5-32.
[16] BRAMSON A, GRIM P, SINGER D J, et al. Disambiguation of social polarization concepts and measures[J]. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2016, 40(2): 80-111.
[17] HSIAO Y C, YU E C H. Polarization perception and support for democracy: the case of Taiwan[J]. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 2020, 55(8): 1143-1162.
[18] DRUCKMAN J N, PETERSON E, SLOTHUUS R. How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation[J]. American Political Science Review, 2013, 107(1): 57-79.
[19] DELLAPOSTA D. Pluralistic collapse: the “Oil Spill” model of mass opinion polarization[J]. American Sociological Review, 2020, 85(3): 507-536.
[20] TORNBERG P, ANDERSSON C, LINDGREN K, et al. Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society[J]. Plos One, 2021, 16(10): e0258259.
[21] STONER J A F. A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk[D]. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961.
[22] MOSCOVICI S, ZAVALLONI M. The group as a polarizer of attitudes[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 12(2): 125-135.
[23] ISENBERG D J. Group polarization: a critical review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(6): 1141-1151.
[24] LI J, XIAO R B. Agent-based modelling approach for multidimensional opinion polarization in collective behaviour[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2017, 20(2): 4.
[25] CHAU H F, WONG C Y, CHOW F K, et al. Social judgment theory based model on opinion formation, polarization and evolution[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2014, 415: 133-140.
[26] JAGER W, AMBLARD F. Uniformity, bipolarization and pluriformity captured as generic stylized behavior with an agent-based simulation model of attitude change[J]. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2005, 10(4): 295-303.
[27] BANISCH S, OLBRICH E. An argument communication model of polarization and ideological alignment[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2021, 24(1): 1.
[28] LA ROCCA C E, BRAUNSTEIN L A, VAZQUEZ F. The influence of persuasion in opinion formation and polarization[J]. Europhysics Letters, 2014, 106(4): 40004.
[29] MÄS M, FLACHE A. Differentiation without distancing. explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(11): e74516.
[30] HAGHTALAB N, JACKSON M O, PROCACCIA A D. Belief polarization in a complex world: a learning theory perspective[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(19): e2010144118.
[31] DANDEKAR P, GOEL A, LEE D T. Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(15): 5791-5796.
[32] 王宁, 赵胜洋, 杨学成. 基于自我归类理论的群体极化模型与仿真[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(3): 130-139.
WANG N, ZHAO S Y, YANG X C. Group polarization model and simulation based on self-categorization theory[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2020, 39(3): 130-139.
[33] BARRERA LEMARCHAND F, SEMESHENKO V, NAVAJAS J, et al. Polarizing crowds: consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model[J]. Chaos, 2020, 30(6): 063141.
[34] FU G Y, ZHANG W D. Opinion formation and bi-polarization with biased assimilation and homophily[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2016, 444: 700-712.
[35] HIGHAM D J, MANTZARIS A V. A network model for polarization of political opinion[J]. Chaos, 2020, 30(4): 043109.
[36] SCHWEITZER F, KRIVACHY T, GARCIA D. An agent-based model of opinion polarization driven by emotions[J]. Complexity, 2020: 5282035.
[37] KRUEGER T, SZWABIN~SKI J, WERON T. Conformity, anticonformity and polarization of opinions: insights from a mathematical model of opinion dynamics[J]. Entropy, 2017, 19(7): 371.
[38] PRASETYA H A, MURATA T. A model of opinion and propagation structure polarization in social media[J]. Computational Social Networks, 2020, 7: 2.
[39] ZHAO Y Y, ZHANG L B, TANG M F, et al. Bounded confidence opinion dynamics with opinion leaders and environmental noises[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2016, 74: 205-213.
[40] ZHAO Y Y, KOU G, PENG Y, et al. Understanding influence power of opinion leaders in e-commerce networks: an opinion dynamics theory perspective[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 426: 131-147.
[41] 虞鑫, 许弘智. 意见领袖、沉默的螺旋与群体极化:基于社会网络视角的仿真研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2019, 41(5): 6-26.
YU X, XU H Z. Opinion leader, spiral of silence and group polarization: a simulation study on social network perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism and Communication, 2019, 41(5): 6-26.
[42] BAUMANN F, SOKOLOV I M, TYLOO M. A laplacian approach to stubborn agents and their role in opinion formation on influence networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 557: 124869.
[43] GHEZELBASH E, YAZDANPANAH M J, ASADPOUR M. Polarization in cooperative networks through optimal placement of informed agents[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 536: 120936.
[44] FELICIANI T, FLACHE A, TOLSMA J. How, when and where can spatial segregation induce opinion polarization? two competing models[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2017, 20(2): 6.
[45] SIRBU A, PEDRESCHI D, GIANNOTTI F, et al. Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion fragmentation and polarization: a bounded confidence model[J]. Plos One, 2018, 14(3): e0213246.
[46] SANTOS F P, LELKES Y, LEVIN S A. Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(50): e2102141118.
[47] BAUMANN F, LORENZ-SPREEN P, SOKOLOV I M, et al. Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 124(4): 048301.
[48] WALDROP M M. News feature: modeling the power of polarization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(37): e2114484118.
[49] SHERIF M, HOVLAND C I. Social judgment: assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change[M]. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press, 1961.
[50] 陈福平, 许丹红. 观点与链接:在线社交网络中的群体政治极化[J]. 社会, 2017, 37(4): 217-240.
CHEN F P, XU D H. Comments and links: group political polarization in social networking sites[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2017, 37(4): 217-240.
[51] 刘强, 赵茜. 算法中选择的同化与异化——国外回音室效应研究20年述评与展望[J]. 新闻界, 2021(6): 29-38.
LIU Q, ZHAO X. Assimilation and dissimilation of selection in algorithms: a review and prospect of the study of echo chamber effect in foreign countries in the past 20 years[J]. Journalism and Mass Communication, 2021(6): 29-38.
[52] 卢智增, 高翔. 社交媒体平台群体极化的形成机理与引导策略研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(8): 51-58.
LU Z Z, GAO X. The study on the formation mechanism and guiding strategies of group polarization in social media platforms[J]. Information Studies: Theory and Application, 2021, 44(8): 51-58.
[53] WOJCIESZAK M. Deliberation and attitude polarization[J]. Journal of Communication, 2011, 61(4): 596-617.
[54] BAIL C A, ARGYLE L P, BROWN T W, et al. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(37): 9216-9221.
[55] FAN K, PEDRYCZ W. Evolution of public opinions in closed societies influenced by broadcast media[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, 472: 53-66.
[56] CHEN Z, LAN H. Dynamics of public opinion: diverse media and audiences’ choices[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2021, 24(2): 8.
[57] LORD C G, ROSS L, LEPPER M R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37(11): 2098-2109.
[58] XIA W G, YE M B, LIU J, et al. Analysis of a nonlinear opinion dynamics model with biased assimilation[J]. Automatica, 2020, 120: 109113.
[59] CHEN Z H, QIN J H, Li B, et al. Dynamics of opinions with social biases[J]. Automatica, 2019, 106: 374-383.
[60] VALLONE R P, ROSS L, LEPPER M R. The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49(3): 577-585.
[61] 马萍. 敌意媒介效果:媒介偏见研究的新转向[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 48(5): 73-79.
MA P. Hostile media effect: a new turn in media bias research[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences), 2020, 48(5): 73-79.
[62] PERLOFF R M. A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect[J]. Mass Communication and Society, 2015, 18(6): 701-729.
[63] POST S. Polarizing communication as media effects on antagonists. understanding communication in conflicts in digital media societies[J]. Communication Theory, 2019, 29(2): 213-235.
[64] 张轩宇, 陈曦, 肖人彬. 后真相时代基于敌意媒体效应的观点演化建模与仿真[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023,20(3):44-51,59.
ZHANG X Y, CHEN X, XIAO R B. Modeling and simulation of opinion evolution based on hostile media effect in the post-truth era[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2023,20(3):44-51,59.
[65] GUNTHER A C, MILLER N, LIEBHART J L. Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect[J]. Communication Research, 2009, 36(6): 747-764.
[66] MAFAEL A, GOTTSCHALK S A, KREIS H. Examining biased assimilation of brand-related online reviews[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2016, 36: 91-106.
[67] RICHARDSON J D, HUDDY W P, MORGAN S M. The hostile media effect, biased assimilation, and perceptions of a presidential debate[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2008, 38(5): 1255-1270.
[68] GEARHART S, MOE A, ZHANG B. Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility[J]. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2020, 2(2): 140-148.
[69] REID S A. A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect[J]. Journal of Communication, 2012, 62(3): 381-399.
[70] HARTMANN T, TANIS M. Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: the role of ingroup identification and status[J]. Journal of Communication, 2013, 63(3): 535-555.
[71] 王东, 刘雪琳. 转基因论战中的偏见同化与敌意感知:意见领袖对派别成员的影响[J]. 国际新闻界, 2021, 43(2): 47-60.
WANG D, LIU X L. Biased assimilation and hostile media effect in the controversy of GM food: the influences of opinion leader[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism and Communication, 2021, 43(2): 47-60.
[72] EINAV G, ALLEN O, GUR T, et al. Bursting filter bubbles in a digital age: opening minds and reducing opinion polarization through digital platforms[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 71: 102136.
[73] de ARRUDA H F, CARDOSO F M, de ARRUDA G F, et al. Modelling how social network algorithms can influence opinion polarization[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 588: 265-278.
[74] de BOER V, KEIJZER M A, MÄS M. The complex link between filter bubbles and opinion polarization[J]. Data Science, 2022, 5(2): 139-166.
[75] 王一伊, 卜凡亮. 涉恐个体极端思想演化双阈值观点动力学模型[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022,19(4):55-63.
WANG Y Y, BU F L. A dual-threshold viewpoint dynamics model for the evolution of individual extreme thoughts in the context of terrorism[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2022,19(4):55-63.
[1] 张轩宇, 陈曦, 肖人彬. 后真相时代基于敌意媒体效应的观点演化建模与仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(3): 44-51.
[2] 刘晓露, 贾书伟. 用户—产品二部分网络中用户声誉实证研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(1): 37-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed