Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2026, Vol. 23 Issue (3): 80-88    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2026.03.010
  多智能体系统 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于连续动作学习的社交机器人舆论引导模型
顾家豪, 程纯, 丁卫平
南通大学人工智能与计算机学院,江苏 南通 226019
Public Opinion Guidance Model: Social Bots Based on Continuous Action Learning Method
GU Jiahao, CHENG Chun, DING Weiping
School of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China
全文: PDF(3049 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在社交媒体日益成为社会舆论传播的重要平台的背景下,社交机器人对网络公众舆论存在恶意引导和操纵现象。为了探究其引导机制,结合经典Hegselmann-Krause模型与连续动作学习自动机算法,采用多智能体方法对社交机器人与用户个体之间的观点交互进行微观建模,并通过仿真捕获网络舆论的宏观分布特性。实验结果表明,社交机器人在不同复杂的环境中能够有效使用CALA算法获取网络关注度,引导用户群体观点向预定目标方向发展。研究验证了机器人在舆论引导中的可行性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
顾家豪
程纯
丁卫平
关键词 观点动力学舆论引导强化学习连续动作学习自动机    
Abstract:In the context of social media increasingly becoming an important platform for the spread of public opinion, social bots have malicious guidance and manipulation of online public opinion. In order to explore its guidance mechanism, this paper combines the classic Hegselmann-Krause model with the continuous action learning automaton algorithm (CALA), uses a multi-agent method to model the interaction between social bots and individual users, and captures the distribution characteristics of online public opinion through simulation. Experimental results show that social bots can effectively use the CALA algorithm to obtain network attention in different complex environments and guide the opinions of user groups to develop in the direction of predetermined goals. The study verifies the feasibility of bots in public opinion guidance.
Key wordsopinion dynamics    opinion guidance    reinforcement learning    continuous-action learning automata
收稿日期: 2024-09-11      出版日期: 2026-07-14
ZTFLH:  TP391.9  
基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(21YJCZH013);江苏省高校自然科学研究项目-面上项目(22KJB120008)
通讯作者: 丁卫平(1979-),男,江苏常州人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为人工智能及计算智能。   
作者简介: 顾家豪(2001-),男,江苏南通人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为社交网络建模分析。
引用本文:   
顾家豪, 程纯, 丁卫平. 基于连续动作学习的社交机器人舆论引导模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(3): 80-88.
GU Jiahao, CHENG Chun, DING Weiping. Public Opinion Guidance Model: Social Bots Based on Continuous Action Learning Method[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2026, 23(3): 80-88.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2026.03.010      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2026/V23/I3/80
[1] SCHMUCK D, SIKORSKI C V. Perceived threats from social bots: the media's role in supporting literacy[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020, 113: 106507.
[2] GUENON N M D, SCOTT D H, ZAKARIA H E, et al. Detecting bots and assessing their impact in social networks[J]. Operations Research, 2022, 70(1): 1-22.
[3] ZHANG Y, SONG W, SHAO J, et al. Social bots' role in the COVID-19 pandemic discussion on Twitter[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(4): 3284.
[4] ZENG Z, LI T, SUN J, et al. Research on the generalization of social bot detection from two dimensions: feature extraction and detection approaches[J]. Data Technologies and Applications, 2023, 57(2): 177-198.
[5] MALIK N, KAR A K, TRIPATHI S N, et al. Exploring the impact of fairness of social bots on user experience[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 197: 122913.
[6] KHAUND T, KIRDEMIR B, AGARWAL N, et al. Social bots and their coordination during online campaigns: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 9(2): 530-545.
[7] CAI M, LUO H, MENG X, et al. Network distribution and sentiment interaction: information diffusion mechanisms between social bots and human users on social media[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2023, 60(2): 103197.
[8] LIU X, ZHAN Y, JIN H, et al. Research on the classification methods of social bots[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12(14): 3030.
[9] ZHANG Y, MA J, FANG F. How social bots can influence public opinion more effectively: right connection strategy[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2024, 633: 129386.
[10] POZZANA I, FERRARA E. Measuring bot and human behavioral dynamics[J]. Frontiers in Physics, 2020, 8: 125.
[11] SHI W, LIU D, YANG J, et al. Social bots' sentiment engagement in health emergencies: a topic-based analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic discussions on Twitter[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(22): 8701.
[12] GRIMME C, PREUSS M, ADAM L, et al. Social bots: human-like by means of human control?[J]. Big Data, 2017, 5(4): 279-293.
[13] ROSS B, PILZ L, CABRERA B, et al. Are social bots a real threat? an agent-basedmodel of the spiral of silence to analyse the impact of manipulative actors in social networks[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2019, 28(4): 394-412.
[14] CHENG C, LUO Y, YU C. Dynamic mechanism of social bots interfering with public opinion in network[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 551: 124163.
[15] LI T, ZHU H. Effect of the media on the opinion dynamics in online social networks[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 551: 124117.
[16] CHENG C, GU J, LU S, et al. Modified hegselmann-Krause model for enhancing opinion diversity in social networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12: 140715-140721.
[17] CHENG C, LUO Y, YU C, et al. Social bots and mass media manipulated public opinion through dual opinion climate[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2022, 31(1): 018701.
[18] WANG L, BERNARDO C, HONG Y, et al. Consensus in concatenated opinion dynamics with stubborn agents[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2022, 68(7): 4008-4023.
[19] LI K, LIANG H, KOU G, et al. Opinion dynamicsmodel based on the cognitive dissonance: an agent-based simulation[J]. Information Fusion, 2020, 56: 1-14.
[20] SCHWEIGHOFER S, GARCIA D, SCHWEITZER F. An agent-basedmodel of multi-dimensional opinion dynamics and opinion alignment[J]. Chaos: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2020, 30(9): 093139.
[21] ROZANOVA L, BOGUÁ M. Dynamical properties of the herding votermodel with and without noise[J]. Physical Review E, 2017, 96(1): 012310.
[22] BERNARDO C, ALTAFINI C, PROSKURNIKOV A, et al. Bounded confidence opinion dynamics: a survey[J]. Automatica, 2024, 159: 111302.
[23] HEGSELMANN R, KRAUSE U. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidencemodels, analysis, and simulation[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, 5(3): 2.
[24] WEISBUCH G, DEFFUANT G, AMBLARD F, et al. Meet, discuss, and segregate[J]. Complexity, 2002, 7(3): 55-63.
[25] WANG M, LI F, LIANG D. Opinion dynamics and consensus achievement strategy based on reinforcement learning[C]//2020 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT). Louisville, KY, USA: IEEE, 2020: 1-6.
[26] WANG M, LIANG D, XU Z. Consensus achievement strategy of opinion dynamics based on deep reinforcement learning with time constraint[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2022, 73(12): 2741-2755.
[27] GUO S, XU H, XIE G, et al. Reinforcement learning-based consensus reaching in large-scale social networks[C]//International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023: 169-183.
[28] HE Q, LV Y, WANG X, et al. Reinforcement-learning-based dynamic opinion maximization framework in signed social networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2022, 15(1): 54-64.
[29] MOERLAND T M, BROEKENS J, PLAAT A, et al. Model-based reinforcement learning: a survey[J]. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2023, 16(1): 1-118.
[30] NIE M, CHEN D, WANG D. Reinforcement learning on graphs: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2023 7(4): 1065-1082.
[31] ZHANG C, FANG D, SEN S, et al. Opinion dynamics in gossiper-media networks based on multiagent reinforcement learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2022, 10(2): 1143-1156.
[1] 蔡丹妮, 张文兵, 吴光磊. 多领导影响下个体表达与隐私意见的动态分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(3): 73-79.
[2] 林迎霞, 亓庆源. 含未知系统信息的平均场系统强化学习研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(3): 153-160.
[3] 李卓群, 王舒仪, 蔡子诚. 深度强化学习库存决策结果的动态演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(3): 25-33.
[4] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[5] 马明扬, 杨洪勇, 刘飞. 基于强化学习的双人博弈差分隐私保护研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(4): 107-114.
[6] 刘与同, 陈曦. 网络舆情中基于心理暗示的温和舆论引导策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 30-37.
[7] 李雪岩, 张同宇, 祝歆. 基于深度强化学习的通勤走廊韧性恢复双层规划[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 92-99.
[8] 韩艺琳, 王丽丽, 杨洪勇, 范之琳. 基于强化学习的多机器人系统的环围编队控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(3): 97-102.
[9] 王一伊, 卜凡亮. 涉恐个体极端思想演化双阈值观点动力学模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(4): 55-63.
[10] 陈卓然, 韩定定. 一类交通信息物理系统的动态路径引导[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(1): 81-87.
[11] 徐泽洲, 曲大义, 洪家乐, 宋晓晨. 智能网联汽车自动驾驶行为决策方法研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(3): 88-94.
[12] 赵旭, 金奥岚, 胡斌. 基于观点动力学的水库移民文化适应机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(2): 39-50.
[13] 刘举胜, 何建佳, 韩景倜, 于长锐. 观点动力学研究现状及进展述评[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(2): 9-20.
[14] 郑振华, 刘其朋. 基于视觉特征提取的强化学习自动驾驶系统[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(4): 30-37.
[15] 刘琪, 肖人彬. 观点动力学视角下基于意见领袖的网络舆情反转研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 1-13.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed