Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2025, Vol. 22 Issue (4): 29-36    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2025.04.005
  复杂网络 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
集成电路产业创新合作关系瓦解因素探析
刘晓燕, 赵曦雨, 单晓红, 谢桂生
北京工业大学经济与管理学院,北京 100124
Exploring the Factors of Tie Dissolution of Innovation Cooperation in Integrated Circuit Industry
LIU Xiaoyan, ZHAO Xiyu, SHAN Xiaohong, XIE Guisheng
College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
全文: PDF(2396 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 挖掘影响集成电路产业创新合作关系瓦解的因素可以实现关系变化的早期预警,提升创新合作网络稳定性。以嵌入性理论为基础,引入关系异质性、关系嵌入性两个维度构建集成电路产业创新合作网络关系瓦解影响模型,借助机器学习中的GBDT与RF算法挖掘关系瓦解的关键因素。研究表明:伴随集成电路产业创新合作网络规模扩大,关系瓦解明显增多;关系强度是影响关系瓦解的本质因素;地区异质性、能力异质性是影响关系瓦解的关键因素;判断合作伙伴关系瓦解风险需要综合考虑关系强度、地区异质性、能力异质性与约束系数。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘晓燕
赵曦雨
单晓红
谢桂生
关键词 合作关系瓦解机器学习集成电路产业    
Abstract:Exploring the factors that affect the tie dissolution of innovation cooperation in IC industry can realize the early warning of tie changes and improve the stability of innovation cooperation network.. Drawing on the embeddedness theory, this study constructs a model for analyzing the factors influencing the dissolution of ties within the innovation cooperation network of the integrated circuit industry, incorporating the dimensions of relational heterogeneity and relational embeddedness. Machine learning algorithms such as GBDT (Gradient Boosting Decision Tree) and RF (Random Forest) are employed to identify the key factors contributing to ties dissolution. The research findings indicate that as the scale of the integrated circuit industry's innovation cooperation network expands, ties dissolution becomes more apparent. The intensity of ties is identified as the fundamental factor influencing relationship dissolution. Regional heterogeneity and capability heterogeneity are identified as critical factors affecting tie dissolution. When assessing the risk of partnership dissolution, it is necessary to comprehensively consider tie intensity, regional heterogeneity, capability heterogeneity, and constraint coefficients.
Key wordsdissolution of the tie    machine learning    IC industry
收稿日期: 2023-12-12      出版日期: 2025-12-10
ZTFLH:  F273.1  
  F426.63  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(72174016);国家自然科学基金(72104015,72304025 )
通讯作者: 单晓红(1976),女,吉林吉林人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为信息管理、商务智能。   
作者简介: 刘晓燕(1974),女,河北唐山人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为组织理论与战略管理。
引用本文:   
刘晓燕, 赵曦雨, 单晓红, 谢桂生. 集成电路产业创新合作关系瓦解因素探析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 29-36.
LIU Xiaoyan, ZHAO Xiyu, SHAN Xiaohong, XIE Guisheng. Exploring the Factors of Tie Dissolution of Innovation Cooperation in Integrated Circuit Industry[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2025, 22(4): 29-36.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2025.04.005      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2025/V22/I4/29
[1] 杨忠,巫强,宋孟璐,等.美国《芯片与科学法案》对我国半导体产业发展的影响及对策研究:基于创新链理论的视角[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(1):146160.
YANG Z, WU Q, SONG M L, et al. The influence of the chip and science act on the development of China's semiconductor industry and its countermeasures: from the perspective of innovation chain theory[J]. Nankai Management Review, 2023,26(1):146160.
[2] AHUJA G, SODA G, ZAHEER A. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks[J]. Organ Sci, 2012, 23(2):434448.
[3] 白京羽,刘中全,王颖婕.基于博弈论的创新联合体动力机制研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(10):105113.
BAI J Y, LIU Z Q, WANG Y J. Research on dynamic mechanism of innovation consortium based on game theory[J]. Science Research Management,2020,41(10):105113.
[4] KLEINBAUM A M. Reorganization and tie decay choices[J]. Management Science, 2017,64(5):22192237.
[5] 唐建荣,姜雪.区域创新合作网络演化特征与动力研究——以长三角为例[J].科技与经济,2023,36(1):2630.
TANG J R, JIANG X. Evolution characteristics and dynamics of regional innovation cooperation network: a case study of the Yangtze Delta[J]. Science and Technology and Economy, 2019,36(1):2630.
[6] 吴洁,谢小东,盛永祥,等.创新联合体潜在合作伙伴选择研究[DB/OL].(20231102)[20240126]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1402.N.20231101. 1501.010.html.
WU J, XIE X D, SHENG Y X, et al. Research on the selection of potential partners for innovation consortium[DB/OL].(20231102)[20240126]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1402.N.20231101.1501.010.html.
[7] 毛荐其,嵇金星,刘娜,等.发明者网络嵌入、稳定性与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学决策,2021(3):117.
MAO S X, JI J X, LIU N, et al. Research on the relationship between inventor network embedment, stability and innovation performance[J]. Scientific Decision,2021(3):117.
[8] MA D L, NARAYANAN V K, LIU C R, et al. Boundary salience: the interactive effect of organizational status distance and geographical proximity on coauthorship tie formation[J]. Social Networks, 2020, 63(7): 162173.
[9] 谢伟伟,邓宏兵,苏攀达.长江中游城市群知识创新合作网络研究——高水平科研合著论文实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(16):4450.
XIE W W, DENG H B, SU P D. Research on knowledge innovation cooperation network of urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River: an empirical analysis of high-level research co-authored papers[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2019, 36(16):4450.
[10] 和欣,陈传明,郑莹,等.联盟关系断裂研究述评与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2019,41(4):3144.
HE X, CHEN C M, ZHENG Y, et al. Review and future prospect of research on the breakdown of alliance relations[J]. Foreign Economics and Management,2019,41(4):3144.
[11] ZHANG V S, KING M D. Tie decay and dissolution: contentious prescribing practices in the prescription drug epidemic[J]. Organization Science, 2021,32: 5.
[12] TAINTER J, TAYLOR T, BRAIN R, et al. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource[M]. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2015:114.
[13] 党兴华,张晨.基于STERGM的风险投资网络演化动力研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(5):182190.
DANG X H, ZHANG C. Research on evolution dynamics of venture capital network based on STERGM[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5):182190.
[14] GOFFMAN E. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order[M].London:Penguin Books, 2010.
[15] CORSARO D, CANTÙ C, TUNISINI A. Actors' Heterogeneity in Innovation Networks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2012, 41(5): 780789.
[16] GOERZEN A, BEAMISH P W. The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(4): 333354.
[17] 贾昌进,张宝建.技术创新网络社群对创新绩效的影响——以中国电子信息材料专利网络为例[J].中国科技论坛, 2022(8): 2838.
JIA C J, ZHANG B J. The impact of technological innovation network community on innovation performance: a case study of China's electronic information materials patent network[J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2022(8): 2838.
[18] 张巍,党兴华.企业网络权力与网络能力关联性研究——基于技术创新网络的分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(7):10941101.
ZHANG W, DANG X H. Research on the correlation between enterprise network power and network capability: based on the analysis of technological innovation network[J]. Research in Science of Science,2011,29(7):10941101.
[19] GRANOVETTER M. Society and Economy: Framework and Principles[M]. MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
[20] 陈萍,彭文成.强关系与弱关系下企业网络中的知识共享进化博弈分析[J].情报理论与实践,2014, 37(4): 2831.
CHEN P, PENG W C. An evolutionary game analysis of knowledge sharing in enterprise networks under strong and weak relationships[J]. Information Theory and Practice,2014, 37(4): 2831.
[21] KRACKHARDT D,Burt R S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 350.
[22] 吴俊,邓烨,王志刚,等.复杂网络瓦解问题研究进展与展望[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2022, 19(3): 113.
WU J, DENG Y, WANG Z G, et al. Research progress and prospects of complex network collapse[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science,2022, 19(3): 113.
[23] BENSON A R, ABEBE R, SCHAUB M T, et al. Simplicial closure and higher-order link prediction[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(48): E11221E11230.
[1] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[2] 杨国忠, 周午阳. 基于供应链视角的企业协同生态创新演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 120-128.
[3] 刘晓燕, 庞雅如, 谢桂生. 基于组织-技术依存网络的技术融合机理[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 58-65.
[4] 刘晓燕, 孙丽娜, 裘靖文, 单晓红. 基于多层网络的人工智能领域跨界技术融合[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(1): 45-51.
[5] 吴慧, 顾晓敏, 赵袁军. 产学研合作创新网络拓扑演化的复杂网络研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(4): 38-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed