Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2020, Vol. 17 Issue (3): 52-61    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2020.03.005
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
政府对“农超对接”发展影响的多方博弈与仿真
付帅帅1, 陈伟达1, 丁军飞1, 王丹丹2
1.东南大学经济管理学院,南京 211189;
2.南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,南京 210016
Multi-Party Game and Simulation of Government Impact on the Development of Agricultural Supermarket Docking
FU Shuaishuai1, CHEN Weida1, DING Junfei1, WANG Dandan2
1. School of Economics and management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
2. College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
全文: PDF(2932 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 考虑“农超对接”发展过程中政府引导对农户、连锁超市企业决策的影响,构建政府引导—连锁超市企业运作—农户参与的演化博弈模型,探讨不同主体间策略选择的相互作用机制,并借助仿真分析不同成员运作行为对“农超对接”稳定运作的影响。研究发现:农户、连锁超市企业对政府政策扶持及补贴的价值感知及参与成本及收益的高低是影响双方决策行为的重要因素;惩罚力度较低时有利于政府、连锁超市企业向积极运作的方向演化,中等监管力度有助于双方对“农超对接”业务运作达成一致,否则会因监管成本过高,造成政府政策引导的困境。最后,指出政府应继续发挥在“农超对接”发展中的主导作用,并提出促进其健康、有序发展的对策及建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
付帅帅
陈伟达
丁军飞
王丹丹
关键词 政府引导农超对接演化博弈仿真分析    
Abstract:Considering the influence of government guidance on the decision-making of farmers and supermarket chain enterprises during the development of agricultural super-docking, an evolutionary game model was constructed with government, enterprises and farmers, investigate the interaction mechanism of strategy choice between different subjects, and with the help of the simulation analysis of different members operation behavior, the influence of the farmers and stable operation. The result shows that the value perception of government policy support and subsidies by farmers and companies, as well as the level of participation costs and benefits, are important factors that affect the decision-making behavior of both parties; the low punishment intensity is benefit the government and companies in the direction of active operation evolution. Medium supervision intensity is helpful for both sides to reach an agreement on the business operation of "connecting farmers and supermarkets". Otherwise, the supervision cost will be too high, resulting in the dilemma of government policy guidance. Finally, it is pointed that the government should continue to play a leading role in the development of agricultural super docking. And put forward countermeasures and suggestions to promote its healthy and orderly development.
Key wordsgovernment guidance    agricultural super-docking    evolutionary game    simulation analysis
收稿日期: 2019-12-30      出版日期: 2020-09-23
ZTFLH:  F2224.32  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71971058; 71571042)
通讯作者: 陈伟达(1965-),男,浙江海宁人,教授,博士,主要研究方向为再制造运作管理和低碳运作管理。   
作者简介: 付帅帅(1991-),男,河南商丘人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为供应链管理、生产决策。
引用本文:   
付帅帅, 陈伟达, 丁军飞, 王丹丹. 政府对“农超对接”发展影响的多方博弈与仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(3): 52-61.
FU Shuaishuai, CHEN Weida, DING Junfei, WANG Dandan. Multi-Party Game and Simulation of Government Impact on the Development of Agricultural Supermarket Docking. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(3): 52-61.
链接本文:  
http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2020.03.005      或      http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V17/I3/52
[1] Pritchard B, Gonwin M. The impact of supermarket procurement on farming communities in India: evidence from rural Kamataka [J]. Development Policy ,2010, 28(4): 435-456.
[2] Reardon T, Hopkins R. The supermarket revolution in developing countries: policies to address emerging tensions among supermarkets, suppliers and traditional retailers[J]. The European Journal of Development Research, 2006, 18(4): 522-545.
[3] 郭锦墉, 徐磊. 农民合作社参与“农超对接”研究:述评与展望[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2016, 14(5): 604-612.
Guo Jinyong, Xu Lei. Peasant cooperatives participating in the research of “agricultural super docking”: review and prospect [J]. Journal of Agricultural-Forestry Economic Management, 2016, 14(5): 604-612.
[4] Moustier P, Tam P T G, Anh D T. The role of farmer organizations in supplying supermarkets with quality food in Vietnam [J]. Food Policy,2010,(35):69-78.
[5] Ji S W, Wang K, Kui Y. Logistics reorganization of supermarket chains based on agriculture super docking[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2013, 253(10): 1508-1511.
[6] 张明月, 郑军, 李全海. 基于DEA-Tobit的“农超对接”效率及其影响因素分析——以生鲜农产品为例[J]. 农村经济, 2018, 35(11): 61-67.
Zhang Mingyue, Zheng Jun, Li Quanhai. DEA-Tobit-based "agricultural super-docking" efficiency and analysis of its influencing factors-taking fresh agricultural products as an example [J]. Rural Economy, 2018, 35(11): 61-67.
[7] 郭锦墉, 徐磊. 农民合作社“农超对接”对接关系稳定性及其影响因素分析[J]. 商业经济与管理,2017, 36(10): 13-23.
Guo Jinyong, Xu Lei. Analysis of the stability and influencing factors of the docking relationship of the farmers' cooperative "agricultural super docking" [J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2017, 36(10): 13-23.
[8] 周水平,徐新峰. 农民合作社禀赋对其“农超对接”参与意愿和参与程度的影响分析——基于江西的抽样调查[J]. 江西社会科学, 2019, 39(1): 227-232.
Zhou Xiaoping, Xu Xinfeng. Analysis of the impact of endowment of farmers' cooperatives on their willingness and degree of participation in the“ agricultural super docking ”—— Jiangxi based sample survey [J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2019, 39(1): 227-232.
[9] 张明月, 薛兴利, 郑军. 合作社参与“农超对接”满意度及其影响因素分析——基于15省580家合作社的问卷调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2017, 37(3): 87-101.
Zhang Mingyue, Xue Xingli, Zheng Jun. Satisfaction of cooperatives participating in the “agricultural super connect” and its influencing factors analysis——based on a questionnaire survey of 580 cooperatives in 15 provinces [J]. China Rural Survey, 2017, 37(3): 87-101.
[10] Li J F, Wang Z X. Research on coordination of multi-product “agricultural super-docking” supply chain[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, (3): 556-560.
[11] 金亮.不对称信息下“农超对接”供应链定价及合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 34(6): 153-166.
Jin Liang. Pricing and contract design of “agricultural super docking” supply chain under asymmetric information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 34(6): 153-166.
[12] 陈金波, 张俊夏, 鹏萧等. “农超对接”模式下农户心理契约、组织承诺与机会主义行为研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018, 38(6): 128-139.
Chen Jinbo, Zhang Junxia, Peng Xiao, et al. Research on farmers 'psychological contracts, organizational commitment and opportunistic behaviors under the "agricultural super connect" mode [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, 38(6): 128-139.
[13] 杨浩雄, 孙祎琪, 马家骥. “农超对接”过程中的订单违约问题研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 39(6): 225-223.
Yang Haoxiong, Sun Yiqi, Ma Jiaji. Research on the problem of order default in the process of "agricultural super connect" [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 39(6): 225-223.
[14] Su Y S, Yuan X G, Wu J, et al. Coordination of agricultural-super docking supply chain based on policy of government [J]. International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology, 2017(8),73-79.
[15] 张爽, 孙绍荣, 马慧民. 居民垃圾分类行为与政府收费行为的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(7): 68-75.
Zhang Shuang, Sun Shaorong, Ma Huimin. Evolutionary game analysis of resident garbage classification behavior and government charging behavior [J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(7): 68-75.
[16] Friedman D. On economic applications of evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1998, 8(1): 15-43.
[17] 吉富星, 王经绫. 政府和社会资本合作项目优惠政策的有效性——基于三方博弈动态不一致性视角[J]. 经济问题,2018, 39(12): 443-49.
Ji Fuxing, Wang Jingling. Effectiveness of preferential policies for government and social capital cooperation projects——based on the dynamic inconsistency of tripartite game [J]. On Economic Problems, 2018, 39(12): 443-49.
[18] 吴洁, 车晓静, 盛永祥, 等. 基于三方演化博弈的政产学研协同创新机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2019, 35(1): 18-25.
Wu Jie, Che Xiaojing, Sheng Yongxiang, et al. Research on the collaborative innovation mechanism of government, industry, university and research based on the tripartite evolutionary game [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,, 2019, 35(1): 18-25.
[19] 肖琴, 罗帆. 机场外来物风险监管策略的演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 90-97.
Xiao Qin, Luo Fan. Evolutionary game research on risk supervision strategies of airport foreign objects [J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(2): 90-97.
[20] 曹霞, 邢泽宇, 张路蓬. 政府规制下新能源汽车产业发展的演化博弈分析[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 29(9): 82-96.
Cao Xia, Xing Zeyu, Zhang Lupeng. Evolutionary game analysis of new energy vehicle industry development under government regulation [J]. Management Review, 2018, 29(9): 82-96.
[1] 王桂林, 徐勇. 带攻击玩家的演化拥塞博弈的鲁棒性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(2): 47-53.
[2] 芮晨, 张胜发, 陶富, 张维军, 田东华. 基于患者动态知识搜索的医生过度医疗行为研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(2): 86-92.
[3] 全吉, 周亚文, 王先甲. 社会困境博弈中群体合作行为演化研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(1): 1-14.
[4] 章平, 黄傲霜, 罗宏维. 不同类型复杂网络中个体合作行为互动的演化博弈模拟[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(3): 60-70.
[5] 苏雪, 徐勇, 樊旭娇. 切换拓扑企业创新时滞演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 54-62.
[6] 李春发, 王学敏, 来茜茜, 薛楠楠. “互联网+”手机回收模式缘何绩效不彰?——基于mABM的演化博弈仿真分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 63-73.
[7] 李杰, 张睿, 徐勇. 虚假口碑信息控制演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 39-46.
[8] 肖琴, 罗帆. 机场外来物风险监管策略的演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 18-25.
[9] 武利琴, 王金环, 徐勇. 一种基于半张量积的多层网络演化博弈方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 68-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed