Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2018, Vol. 15 Issue (3): 11-18    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.03.002
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
电力信息相互依存网络与单层电网的级联故障比较
吴凌杰, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 姚飞, 汪洋
广西师范大学电子工程学院,广西 桂林 541004
Comparison of Cascading Failures Between Power Information Interdependent Networks and Single-Layer Power Grids
WU Lingjie, ZOU Yanli, WANG Ruirui, YAO Fei, WANG Yang
College of Electronic Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
全文: PDF(1341 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 电力网络和信息网络深度融合,虽然促进网络间的交流,但也带来故障大规模传播的风险。基于电网结构和负载特性,结合信息网调度功能,构建电力信息相互依存网络模型。使用最高负载、最低负载和最高容量比3种节点攻击方式攻击电网单一节点,并与单层电网故障进行比较。研究表明,在最高负载节点攻击下,初始负载较小时,电力信息相互依存网络的鲁棒性比单层电网弱,当初始负载较大时,两种网络鲁棒性接近;在最低负载和最高容量比节点攻击下,两种网络的鲁棒性差异并不明显;在相互依存网络上,最高负载节点攻击的级联故障最难完全消除。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴凌杰
邹艳丽
王瑞瑞
姚飞
汪洋
关键词 电力信息相互依存网络复杂网络鲁棒性级联故障节点攻击    
Abstract:The deep integration of electricity network and information networks can promote communication between networks, but also brings the risk of large-scale transmission of failures. Based on the grid structure and load characteristics, combined with the dispatching function of information network, we construct a "power-information interdependence network" model. Three types of node attack methods are applied to attack a single node of the power grid where the attacked node is the highest load node, the lowest load node or the highest capacity proportion node. The cascade effects are compared with single-layer power grid. Study shows that the robustness of the power information interdependent network is weaker than that of the single-layer power grid under the highest load node attack when the initial load is small. The robustness of the two kinds of networks approaches each other when the initial load is large. The difference in robustness of the two kinds of networks is not obvious at the lowest load node and highest capacity proportion node attack. On the interdependent network, the cascading failure caused by the highest load node attack is the most difficult to eliminate completely.
Key wordspower-information interdependence network    complex network    robustness    cascade failure    node attack
收稿日期: 2018-08-06      出版日期: 2019-01-31
ZTFLH:  TM743  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(11562003);广西多源信息挖掘与安全重点实验室系统性研究课题基金(13-A-02-03)
通讯作者: 邹艳丽(1972-),女,河北沧州人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为基于复杂网络理论的电力网络同步及稳定性。   
作者简介: 吴凌杰(1994-),男,浙江丽水人,硕士研究生,主研方向为复杂网络理论及其应用。
引用本文:   
吴凌杰, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 姚飞, 汪洋. 电力信息相互依存网络与单层电网的级联故障比较[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 11-18.
WU Lingjie, ZOU Yanli, WANG Ruirui, YAO Fei, WANG Yang. Comparison of Cascading Failures Between Power Information Interdependent Networks and Single-Layer Power Grids. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(3): 11-18.
链接本文:  
http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.03.002      或      http://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V15/I3/11
[1]傅杰, 邹艳丽, 谢蓉. 基于复杂网络理论的电力网络关键线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017,14(3):91-96.
Fu Jie, Zou Yanli, Xie Rong. The critical lines identification of the power grid based on the complex network theory[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2017,14(3):91-96.
[2]曾辉,孙峰,李铁,等.澳大利亚“9·28”大停电事故分析及对中国启示[J].电力系统自动化,2017,41(13):1-6.
Zeng Hui, Sun Feng, Li Tie, et al. Analysis of “9·28” blackout in south australia and its enlightenment to china[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(13):1-6.
[3]Shao J, Buldyrev S V, Havlin S, et al. Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations[J]. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2011, 83(2):036116.
[4]Watts D J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002 ,99(9):5766-5771.
[5]Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized criticality:an explanation o the 1/f noise[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1987,59(4):381-384.
[6]Dobson I, Carreras B A, Lynac V E, et al. An initial model for complex dynamics in electric power system blackouts[C]∥34th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Maui, Hawaii, United States: IEEE, 2001:710-718.
[7]Chassin D P, Posse C. Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabasi-Albert network model[J]. Physica A, 2005,355(2/4):667-677.
[8]Lo C H, Ansari N. Decentralized controls and communications for autonomous distribution networks in smart grid[J].IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(1):66-77.
[9]Zhang X, Liu D, Zhan C, et al. Effects of cyber coupling on cascading failures in power systems[J].IEEE Journal on Emerging & Selected Topics in Circuits & Systems, 2017, 7(2):228-238.
[10] Yang Y, Nishikawa T, Motter A E. Small vulnerable sets determine large network cascades in power grids[J]. Science, 2018, 358(6365):3184.
[11] Buldyrev S V, Al E. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(8932):1025-1028.
[12] Korkali M, Veneman J G, Tivnan B F, et al. Reducing cascading failure risk by increasing infrastructure network interdependence[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:44499.
[13] 冀星沛,王波,董朝阳,等.电力信息-物理相互依存网络脆弱性评估及加边保护策略[J].电网技术,2016,40(6):1-7.
Ji Xingpei, Wang Bo, Dong Chaoyang, et al.Vulnerability evaluation and link addition protection strategy research of electrical cyber-14 physical interdependent networks[J].Power System Technology, 2016, 40(6):1-7.
[14] Chen Z, Wu J, Xia Y, et al. Robustness of interdependent power grids and communication networks : a complex network perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs, 2017, (99):1-1.
[15] 董政呈,方彦军,田猛.不同耦合方式和耦合强度对电力-通信耦合网络的影响[J].高电压技术,2015,41(10):3464-3469.
Dong Zhengcheng,Fang Yanjun,Tian Meng. Influences of various coupled patterns and coupling strength on power-communication coupled networks[J].High Voltage Engineering, 2015,41(10):3464-3469.
[16] Wei D Q, Luo X S, Zhang B. Analysis of cascading failure in complex power networks under the load local preferential redistribution rule [J].Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2012, 391(8):2771-2777.
[17] Kinney R, Crucitti P, Albert R. Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid [J]. The European Physical Journal B, 2005, 46(1):101-107.
[18] Wang W X, Chen G R. Universal robustness characteristic of weighted networks against cascading failure [J]. Physical Review E, 2008, 77(2):026101.
[19] Bao Z J, Cao Y J, Ding L J, et al. Comparison of cascading failures in small-world and scale-free networks subject to vertex and edge attacks[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2009, 388(20):4491-4498.
[20] 张喜平, 李永树, 刘刚,等. 节点重要度贡献的复杂网络节点重要度评估方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2014, 11(3):26-32.
Zhang Xiping, Li Yongshu, Liu Gang, et al. Evaluation method of complex network node importance based on node importance contribution[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2014, 11(3): 26-32.
[1] 钱晓东, 杨贝. 基于复杂网络模型的供应链企业合作演化研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 1-10.
[2] 种鹏云, 尹惠. 基于复杂网络的危险品道路运输网络优化策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 56-.
[3] 丁毓, 刘三阳, 陈静静, 白艺光. 基于复杂网络的差分进化算法研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 1-9.
[4] 张正帅, 陈时军, 周晨, 赵瑞. 利用复杂网络技术分析地震活动性特征[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 10-17.
[5] 吴宗柠, 吕俊宇, 蔡宏波, 樊瑛. 双曲空间下国际贸易网络建模与分析——以小麦国际贸易为例[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 31-37.
[6] 应尚军, 纪小妹, 吴婷婷. 国际资本流动网络复杂性研究的总体框架[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 38-44.
[7] 种鹏云, 尹惠. 蓄意攻击策略下危险品运输网络级联失效仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(1): 45-55.
[8] 谭少林, 吕金虎. 复杂网络上的演化博弈动力学——一个计算视角的综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 1-13.
[9] 李树彬, 傅白白, 孙涛, 党文修, 高歌. 复杂网络中观交通流动态限速控制策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 32-42.
[10] 李甍娜, 郭进利, 卞闻, 常宁戈, 肖潇, 陆睿敏. 网络视角下的唐诗[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(4): 66-71.
[11] 杨晓波, 陈楚湘, 王至婉. 基于节点相似性的LFM社团发现算法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 85-90.
[12] 傅杰, 邹艳丽, 谢蓉. 基于复杂网络理论的电力网络关键线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 91-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed