Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2026, Vol. 23 Issue (4): 1-8    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2026.04.001
  综述 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
行人动力学与流行病学融合研究综述
袁小婷1, 唐铁桥1, 陈亮2
1.北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院,北京 102206;
2.北京工业大学交通工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100124
Review of Research Integration Pedestrian Dynamics and Epidemiology
YUAN Xiaoting1, TANG Tieqiao1, CHEN Liang2
1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Beihang University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
全文: PDF(2440 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 面向强传染性疾病风险管控,综述行人动力学与流行病学融合研究的主要进展。行人动力学模型能够刻画个体运动、接触关系和空间暴露过程,为传染病传播风险评估和人群管控措施优化提供有效工具。本文总结了行人微观仿真模型模拟传染病传播过程的研究方法,分析了传染病传播特性,包括传播途径、传播模式和风险评估指标等。在此基础上,本文识别了现有研究在参数设定、数据验证和模型应用方面存在的不足,为人员密集场所传染病传播风险评估与精细化管控提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
袁小婷
唐铁桥
陈亮
关键词 : 行人动力学,  微观仿真,  强传染性疾病,  传播风险,  人群管控    
Abstract:This paper reviews the main progress in the integration of pedestrian dynamics and epidemiology for the risk management of highly infectious diseases. Pedestrian dynamics models can characterize individual movement, contact relationships, and spatial exposure processes, providing effective tools for assessing disease transmission risks and optimizing crowd management measures. This paper summarizes the research methods of pedestrian microsimulation models for simulating disease transmission processes, and analyzes the characteristics of disease transmission, including transmission pathways, transmission patterns, and risk assessment indicators. On this basis, the paper identifies existing limitations in parameter setting, data validation, and model application, providing a reference for transmission risk assessment and refined management of infectious diseases in crowded places.
Key words: pedestrian dynamics    microscopic simulation    highly infectious diseases    transmission risk    crowd management
     出版日期: 2026-09-15
ZTFLH:  TP391.9  
  R181.2  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(72171006)
通讯作者: 唐铁桥(1977-),男,湖南邵阳人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为行人流建模分析。   
作者简介: 袁小婷(1997-),女,河北承德人,博士研究生,主要研究方向为行人流建模分析。
引用本文:   
袁小婷, 唐铁桥, 陈亮. 行人动力学与流行病学融合研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(4): 1-8.
YUAN Xiaoting, TANG Tieqiao, CHEN Liang. Review of Research Integration Pedestrian Dynamics and Epidemiology[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2026, 23(4): 1-8.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2026.04.001      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2026/V23/I4/1
[1] 姜长云, 姜惠宸. 新冠肺炎疫情防控对国家应急管理体系和能力的检视[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(8): 8-18,31.
Jiang C Y, Jiang H C. Review of the COVID-19 pandemic′s impact on national emergency management systems and capabilities[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(8): 8-18,31.
[2] 欧阳芬, 吴荷玉, 杨英,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎快速传播的应对措施[J]. 全科护理, 2020, 18(3): 311-312.
Ouyang F, Wu H Y, Yang Y, et al. Response measures for the rapid spread of COVID-19[J]. Chinese General Practice Nursing, 2020, 18(3): 311-312.
[3] 张发, 李璐, 宣慧玉. 传染病传播模型综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(9): 1736-1744.
Zhang F, Li L, Xuan H Y. Survey of transmission models of infectious disease[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(9): 1736-1744.
[4] 倪顺江. 基于复杂网络理论的传染病动力学建模与研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2011.
Ni S J.Research on modelling of infectious disease spreading based on complex network theory[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2011.
[5] 徐忠朴, 李科赞. 一类含个体意识的SIS网络传播模型的分析[J]. 桂林电子科技大学学报, 2014, 34(6): 503-508.
Xu Z P, Li K Z. Analysis of an SIS network epidemic model with individual awareness[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 2014, 34(6): 503-508.
[6] Zsifkovits M, Pham T S. Modelling and parameterizing pedestrian behaviour in public places: a review[J]. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 2017, 16(4): 630-643.
[7] 毛天露, 王吉, 孟若雨,等. 行人运动建模研究综述[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2023, 35(5): 653-666.
Mao T L, Wang J, Meng R Y, et al. Survey of pedestrian motion modeling methods[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2023, 35(5): 653-666.
[8] Zhao X, Liu S, Yin Y, et al. Airborne transmission of COVID-19 virus in enclosed spaces: an overview of research methods[J]. Indoor Air, 2022, 32(6): e13056.
[9] Li Y, Qian H, Hang J, et al. Probable airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a poorly ventilated restaurant[J]. Building and Environment, 2021, 196: 107788.
[10] Pung R, Chiew C J, Young B E, et al. Investigation of three clusters of COVID-19 in Singapore: implications for surveillance and response measures[J]. The Lancet, 2020, 395(10229): 1039-1046.
[11] Chen W, Zhang N, Wei J, et al. Short-range airborne route dominates exposure of respiratory infection during close contact[J]. Building and Environment, 2020, 176: 106859.
[12] Tellier R. COVID-19: the case for aerosol transmission[J]. Interface Focus, 2022, 12(2): 20210072.
[13] Smither S J, Eastaugh L S, Findlay J S, et al. Experimental aerosol survival of SARS-CoV-2 in artificial saliva and tissue culture media at medium and high humidity[J]. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 2020, 9(1): 1415-1417.
[14] Fiorillo L, Cervino G, Matarese M, et al. COVID-19 surface persistence: a recent data summary and its importance for medical and dental settings[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(9): 3132.
[15] Mcaleer M. Prevention is better than the cure: risk management of COVID-19[J]. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2020, 13(3): 46.
[16] Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris D H, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020, 382(16): 1564-1567.
[17] Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, et al. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents[J]. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2020, 104(3): 246-251.
[18] Warnes S L, Little Z R, Keevil C W. Human coronavirus 229E remains infectious on common touch surface materials[J]. MBio, 2015, 6(6): e01697-15.
[19] Balkan B A, Chang Y, Sparnaaij M, et al. The multi-dimensional challenges of controlling respiratory virus transmission in indoor spaces: Insights from the linkage of a microscopic pedestrian simulation and SARS-CoV-2 transmission model[J]. PLOS Computational Biology, 2024, 20(3): e1011956.
[20] Zhang A, Zhen Q, Zheng C, et al. Assessing the impact of architectural and behavioral interventions for controlling indoor COVID-19 infection risk: an agent-based approach[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 74: 106807.
[21] Bouchnita A, Jebrane A. A hybrid multi-scale model of COVID-19 transmission dynamics to assess the potential of non-pharmaceutical interventions[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2020, 138: 109941.
[22] Garcia W, Mendez S, Fray B, et al. Model-based assessment of the risks of viral transmission in non-confined crowds[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 144: 105453.
[23] Harweg T, Bachmann D, Weichert F. Agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics for exposure time estimation in epidemic risk assessment[J]. Journal of Public Health, 2021, 31: 221-228.
[24] Gosce L, Barton D A W, Johansson A. Analytical modelling of the spread of disease in confined and crowded spaces[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 4856.
[25] Cuevas E. An agent-based model to evaluate the COVID-19 transmission risks in facilities[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2020, 121: 103827.
[26] Xiao Y, Yang M, Zhu Z, et al. Modeling indoor-level non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pedestrian dynamics-based microscopic simulation approach[J]. Transport Policy, 2021, 109: 12-23.
[27] Bulfone T C, Malekinejad M, Rutherford G W, et al. Outdoor transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses: a systematic review[J]. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2021, 223(4): 550-561.
[28] 宫路, 刘湘南, 邹信裕. 基于时空轨迹数据的传染病传播风险评估[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(S1): 6-12.
Gong L, Liu X N, Zou X Y. Spread of infectious disease risk assessment based on the spatial-temporal trajectory data analysis[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2015, 44(S1): 6-12.
[29] Haghani M. Crowd dynamics research in the era of Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities[J]. Safety Science, 2022, 153: 105818.
[30] Lee B, Ahn C R. Agent-based simulation to predict occupants′ physical-distancing behaviors in educational buildings[C]//2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). Phoenix, AZ,USA:IEEE, 2021: 1-9.
[31] Namilae S, Srinivasan A, Mubayi A, et al. Self-propelled pedestrian dynamics model: application to passenger movement and infection propagation in airplanes[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 465: 248-260.
[32] Kante D S I, Jebrane A, Hakim A, et al. Characterization of superspreaders movement in a bidirectional corridor using a social force model[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2023, 11: 1188732.
[33] Ronchi E, Lovreglio R. EXPOSED: An occupant exposure model for confined spaces to retrofit crowd models during a pandemic[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 130: 104834.
[34] Islam M T, Jain S, Chen Y, et al. An agent-based simulation model to evaluate contacts, layout, and policies in entrance, exit, and seating in indoor activities under a pandemic situation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2021, 19(2): 603-619.
[35] Mukherjee D, Wadhwa G. A mesoscale agent based modeling framework for flow-mediated infection transmission in indoor occupied spaces[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 401: 115485.
[36] Comai S, Simeone D, Ventura S M, et al. Simulation modelling in a BIM environment: the case of school re-opening during Covid-19 pandemic[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 2022, 176(1): 12-23.
[37] Riley E C, Murphy G, Riley R L. Airborne spread of measles in a suburban elementary school[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978, 107(5): 421-432.
[38] Nicas M. An analytical framework for relating dose, risk, and incidence: an application to occupational tuberculosis infection[J]. Risk Analysis, 1996, 16(4): 527-538.
[39] Harweg T, Wagner M, Weichert F. Agent-based simulation for infectious disease modelling over a period of multiple days, with application to an airport scenario[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(1): 545.
[40] Li C Y, Yin J. A pedestrian-based model for simulating COVID-19 transmission on college campus[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2023, 19(1): 2005182.
[41] Xiao T, Mu T, Shen S, et al. A dynamic physical-distancing model to evaluate spatial measures for prevention of Covid-19 spread[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 592: 126734.
[42] Li C Y, Yin J, Chen L. Impact of social distancing on disease transmission risk in the context of a pandemic[J]. Physical Review E, 2023, 108(5): 054115.
[43] Sajjadi S, Hashemi A, Ghanbarnejad F. Social distancing in pedestrian dynamics and its effect on disease spreading[J]. Physical Review E, 2021, 104(1): 014313.
[44] Mykoniatis K, Angelopoulou A, Smith T G. Assessing escalator pedestrian traffic dynamics amid COVID-19 pandemic using hybrid simulation[J]. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 2021, 16(3): 237-246.
[45] Schneider I E, Wolfson J A, Tarter W J, et al. Predicting physical distancing on recreational trails during COVID-19[J]. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 2023, 41: 100482.
[46] Zhao Y, Geraerts R. Automatic parameter tuning via reinforcement learning for crowd simulation with social distancing[C]//2022 26th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). Miedzyzdroje, Poland: IEEE, 2022: 87-92.
[47] Hoeben E M, Bernasco W, Suonpera L L, et al. Social distancing compliance: a video observational analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(3): e0248221.
[1] 单洲君, 彭诗雨, 陈曦. 稳态观点在网络上的分布与聚集研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(4): 27-34.
[2] 顾家豪, 程纯, 丁卫平. 基于连续动作学习的社交机器人舆论引导模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(3): 80-88.
[3] 黄锦钿. 基于改进文化基因算法的设备混合批动态调度[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 71-77.
[4] 李寒, 安新磊, 刘思洋, 王越. 基于忆阻自激振荡系统的图像加密算法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 154-160.
[5] 刘思洋, 安新磊, 施倩倩, 王越. 一类多涡卷Chua系统及其在图像加密中的应用[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(3): 85-92.
[6] 王佳亮, 李海滨, 李海燕. 基于复杂网络的新冠病毒群体免疫数值仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 27-33.
[7] 王一伊, 卜凡亮. 涉恐个体极端思想演化双阈值观点动力学模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(4): 55-63.
[8] 胡亮, 肖人彬, 王英聪. 蜂群激发抑制算法及其在交通信号配时中的应用[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(2): 9-18.
[9] 刘琪, 肖人彬. 观点动力学视角下基于意见领袖的网络舆情反转研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2019, 16(1): 1-13.
[10] 蒲玮, 李雄. 基于能力组件的作战仿真Agent模块化结构设计[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 45-57.
[11] 崔琼, 李建华, 冉淏丹, 南明莉. 任务流驱动的指挥信息系统动态超网络模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017, 14(3): 58-67.
[12] 王超, 毕贵红, 张寿明, 于群修. 具有词汇结构的复杂agent网络语言竞争模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13(2): 53-66.
[13] 陈海涛, 张立红, 杨鹏, 于润沧. 考虑出口选择因素的行人疏散模拟研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12(4): 43-49.
[14] 付江月, 张锦, 熊杰, 陈以衡. 城市物流网络空间结构加权局域世界演化模型研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12(3): 38-44.
[15] 蒙在桥, 傅秀芬, 陈培文, 陆靖桥. 基于OSN的谣言传播模型及影响力节点研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12(3): 45-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed