Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2016, Vol. 13 Issue (4): 96-101    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2016.04.013
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
噪音水平和交互频次对策略演化的影响
赵小薇a,b, 夏昊翔a, 张潇a
大连理工大学a.系统工程研究所;b.软件学院,辽宁 大连 116024
Effects of Noise and Interaction Frequency on the Evolution of Cooperative Strategies
ZHAO Xiaoweia,b, XIA Haoxianga, ZHANG Xiaob
a. Institute of Systems Engineering; b. School of Software Technology, Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China
全文: PDF(890 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 囚徒困境是研究合作策略演化的重要工具,重复囚徒困境下的博弈者可以通过合作实现长期利益的最大化。采用生态演化模拟实验的方法研究在重复囚徒困境中初始环境设定的噪音水平和个体间交互频次对博弈策略演化的影响。研究结果表明,噪声水平和个体间交互频次对最终系统中优胜的博弈策略有决定性作用,这说明环境的初始设定条件是影响博弈策略演化的重要因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵小薇
夏昊翔
张潇
关键词 囚徒困境合作演化噪音策略演化    
Abstract:Prisoner’s dilemma is an important tool to study the adaptation of cooperative strategies. Individuals can maximize their profits by cooperating with each other. In this paper, the method of ecological simulation is adopted to study the effects of noise and interaction frequency on the evolution of cooperative strategies in the context of the Noisy Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (NIPD), a version of the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD). The results illustrate that noise and interaction frequency are important factors to the surviving strategies.
Key wordsprisoner’s dilemma    evolution of cooperation    noise    evolution of strategies
收稿日期: 2015-04-08      出版日期: 2025-02-25
ZTFLH:  F224.32  
  N94  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71371040);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(DUT15QY40)
作者简介: 赵小薇(1978-),女,辽宁大连人,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向为演化博弈论、系统科学与系统工程。
引用本文:   
赵小薇, 夏昊翔, 张潇. 噪音水平和交互频次对策略演化的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13(4): 96-101.
ZHAO Xiaowei, XIA Haoxiang, ZHANG Xiao. Effects of Noise and Interaction Frequency on the Evolution of Cooperative Strategies[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2016, 13(4): 96-101.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2016.04.013      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V13/I4/96
[1] Hamilton A R. The evolution of cooperation[J].Science,1981,211(3):1390-1396.
[2] Nowak M. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation[J].Science,2006,314(5805):1560-1563.
[3] Huberman B A,Glance N S. Evolutionary games and computer simulations[J].Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences,1993,(3):7716-7718.
[4] Doz Y L. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes?[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(s1):55-83.
[5] Gómez-Gardenes J,Reinares I,Arenas A,et al. Evolution of cooperation in multiplex networks[J].Scientific Reports,2012,2:620.
[6] Santos F C,Pinheiro F L,Lenaerts T,et al. The role of diversity in the evolution of cooperation[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,2011,299:88-96.
[7] 王先甲,全吉,刘伟兵. 有限理性下的演化博弈与合作机制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011, 31(S1): 82-93.
Wang Xianjia,Quan Ji,Liu Weibing.Research on evolutionary garne and cooperation mechanism under bounded rationality[J].System Engineering Theory & Practice,2011,31(S1):82-93.
[8] 杨阳,荣智海,李翔. 复杂网络演化博弈理论研究综述[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2008,5(4):47-55.
Yang Yang,Rong Zhihai,Li Xiang,A review of the evolution game theory of complex networks[J].Complex Systems and Complexity Science,2008,5(4):47-55.
[9] Wu J,Axelrod R. How to cope with noise in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma[J].The Journal of Conflict Resolution,1995,39(1):183-189.
[10] Axelrod R,Dion D. The further evolution of cooperation[J].Science,1988,242(4884):1385-1390.
[11] Nowak M,Sigmund K. Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations[J].Nature,1992,355(6357):250-253.
[12] Sugden R. The Evolution of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare[M].Oxford: Blackwell,1986.
[13] Boyd, R. Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1989,136(1):47-56.
[14] Kraines D,Kraines V. Pavlov and the prisoner’s dilemma[J].Theory and Decision,1989,26(3):47-79.
[15] Kraines D,Kraines V. Learning to cooperate with pavlov an adaptive strategy for the iterated prisoner’s dilemma with noise[J].Theory and Decision,1993,35:107-150.
[16] Imhof L A,Fudenberg D,Nowak M. Tit-for-tat or Win-stay, Lose-shift?[J].Theory of Bioloyg,2007,247(3):574-580.
[17] Zhao X,Xia H,Yu H,et al. Agents’ cooperation based on long-term reciprocal altruism[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems,2012,689-698.
[18] Nowak M,Sigmund K. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game[J].Nature,1993,364(6432):56-58.
[19] Hamilton A R.The Evolution of Cooperation[M].New York:Basic Books,1984.
[20] Molander P. The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment[J].The Journal of Conflict Resolution,1985,29(4):611-618.
[21] Zhang G Q,Sun Q B,Wang L. Noise-induced enhancement of network reciprocity in social dilemmas[J].Chaos Solitons & Fractals,2013,3(3):31-35.
[22] Yao Y,Chen S S. Multiplicative noise enhances spatial reciprocity[J].Physica A,2014,413:432-437.
[1] 马思佳, 张舒宁, 王奕涵, 张新立. 联合退相位噪声下量子囚徒困境纳什均衡分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(2): 68-73.
[2] 全吉, 周亚文, 王先甲. 社会困境博弈中群体合作行为演化研究综述[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(1): 1-14.
[3] 钱晓东, 杨贝. 基于复杂网络模型的供应链企业合作演化研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 1-10.
[4] 范如国, 崔迎迎, 张应青. 多元偏好、社团结构与网络合作涌现仿真研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13(4): 26-34.
[5] 杜莎, 韩定定, 李德志. 克隆植物的演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2016, 13(1): 95-101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed