Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2024, Vol. 21 Issue (1): 100-108    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.01.013
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
价格竞争、保鲜努力与农产品电商冷链物流模式演化
李春发, 俎晓彤, 田盖地
天津理工大学管理学院,天津 300384
Price Competition, Freshness-keeping Effort and Evolution Mode of Cold Chain Logistics of Agricultural Products E-commerce
LI Chunfa, ZU Xiaotong, TIAN Gaidi
School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China
全文: PDF(1171 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 科学合理的冷链物流模式是确保农产品电商价格、新鲜度竞争力的关键。针对涉及两农产品电商、电商自营冷链物流和第三方冷链物流商的供应链,构建两电商竞争、第三方冷链物流商主导的Stackelberg博弈模型及两电商冷链物流模式选择的演化博弈模型,并通过仿真揭示交叉价格弹性、新鲜度需求弹性、自营和第三方保鲜投入成本系数对演化路径的影响。研究表明:若交叉价格弹性、新鲜度需求弹性和第三方保鲜投入成本系数分别增大,自营冷链物流为演化稳定策略,电商倾向自营冷链物流。若自营保鲜投入成本系数增大,第三方冷链物流为演化稳定策略,电商倾向与第三方冷链物流商合作。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李春发
俎晓彤
田盖地
关键词 农产品电商平台价格竞争保鲜努力冷链物流模式演化博弈    
Abstract:Scientific and reasonable cold chain logistics mode is the key to ensure the price and freshness competitiveness of agricultural products e-commerce. For the supply chain involving two agricultural products e-commerce, e-commerce self-run cold chain logistics and third party cold chain logistics provider, the Stackelberg game model that takes into account the competition between two agricultural products e-commerce, and the dominance of third-party cold chain logistics provider, as well as the evolutionary game model for the choice of two agricultural e-commerce cold chain logistics modes is constructed. The influence of cross price elasticity, freshness demand elasticity, and preservation input cost coefficient of self-run and third-party on the evolution path is revealed through the simulation. The results show that: if the cross price elasticity, freshness demand elasticity and the third-party preservation input cost coefficient increase respectively, self-run cold chain logistics is the stable evolutionary strategy, e-commerce tends to self-run cold chain logistics. If the self-run preservation input cost coefficient increases, the third-party cold chain logistics is the stable strategy, the e-commerce tends to cooperate with the third-party cold chain logistics provider.
Key wordsagricultural products    e-commerce platform    price competition    freshness-keeping effort    cold-chain logistics mode    evolutionary game
收稿日期: 2022-03-20      出版日期: 2024-04-26
ZTFLH:  F272  
  F326  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71902077);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJC630049)
通讯作者: 俎晓彤(1996-),女,河北唐山人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为物流系统优化与决策。   
作者简介: 李春发(1968-),男,湖南郴州人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为物流系统优化与决策。
引用本文:   
李春发, 俎晓彤, 田盖地. 价格竞争、保鲜努力与农产品电商冷链物流模式演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 100-108.
LI Chunfa, ZU Xiaotong, TIAN Gaidi. Price Competition, Freshness-keeping Effort and Evolution Mode of Cold Chain Logistics of Agricultural Products E-commerce[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2024, 21(1): 100-108.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.01.013      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I1/100
[1] 姚源果,贺盛瑜. 基于交通大数据的农产品冷链物流配送路径优化研究[J]. 管理评论,2019,31(4): 240-253.
YAO Y G, HE S Y. Research on optimization of distribution route for cold chain logistics of agricultural products based on traffic big data[J]. Management Review, 2019, 31(4): 240-253.
[2] 艾瑞咨询. 2020年中国生鲜农产品供应链研究报告[DB/OL]. (2020-3-30) [2021-10-7]. https://report.iresearch.cn/ report/202003 /3545.shtml.
I RESEARCH. The research report of China fresh agricultural products supply chain in 2020[DB/OL]. (2020-3-30) [2021-10-7]. https://report.iresearch.cn/ report/202003 /3545.shtml.
[3] BLACKBURN J, SCUDDER G. Supply chain strategies for perishable products: the case of fresh produce[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(2): 129-137.
[4] 曹晓宁,王永明,薛方红,等. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2021,29(3): 109-118.
CAO X N, WANG Y M, XUE F H, et al. Coordination strategies for dual—channel supply chain of fresh agricultural products considering the fresh—keeping effort of supplier[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.
[5] 刘墨林,但斌,马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学,2020,28(8): 76-88.
LIU M L, DAN B, MA S X. Optimal strategies and coordination of fresh e-commerce supply chain considering freshness-keeping effort and value-added service[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[6] CAI X Q, CHEN J, XIAO Y B, et al. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(4): 725-765.
[7] QIN Y Y, WANG J J, WEI C M. Joint pricing and inventory control for fresh produce and foods with quality and physical quantity deteriorating simultaneously[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 152: 42-48.
[8] 杨磊,肖小翠,张智勇. 需求依赖努力水平的生鲜农产品供应链最优定价策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2017,26(1): 145-156.
YANG L, XIAO X C, ZHANG Z Y. Optimal pricing policies of agricultural product supply chain with effort level dependent demand[J].Journal of Systems & Management, 2017, 26(1): 145-156.
[9] 赵帅,李文立,曹晓宁,等. 预售模式下的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调机制[J]. 管理工程学报,2021(4):162-177.
ZHAO S, LI W L, CAO X N, et al. Coordination mechanism of fresh agricultural products dual—channel supply chain under the advance selling mode[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2021(4):162-177.
[10] YU Y L, XIAO T J, FENG Z W. Price and cold-chain service decisions versus integration in a fresh agri-product supply chain with competing retailers[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 287: 465-493.
[11] 余云龙,冯颖.不同冷链服务模式下生鲜农产品供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2021,29(9): 135-143.
YU Y L, FENG Y. Impact of cold-chain service modes on decisions and performance in a fresh agri-product supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(9): 135-143.
[12] 魏国辰. 电商企业生鲜产品物流模式创新[J]. 中国流通经济, 2015(1): 43-50.
WEI G C. Study on the innovation of fresh products logistics model in Chinese e-commerce enterprises[J]. China Business and Market, 2015(1): 43-50.
[13] LI F, FAN Z P, CAO B B, et al. The logistics service mode selection for last mile delivery considering delivery service cost and capability[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 8080.
[14] 赵伶珊,庄小云,杨露. 基于演化博弈的生鲜电商“最后一公里”配送模式选择研究[J]. 黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版),2019, 19(7): 69-74.
ZHAO L S, ZHUANG X Y, YANG L. Selection of “last mile” e-commerce distribution mode for fresh food products based on evolutionary game[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology (Comprehensive Edition), 2019, 19(7): 69-74.
[15] 郭凯,何明柯. 电子商务零售企业自建物流与第三方物流模式选择研究[J]. 物流技术,2015,34(6): 126-129.
GUO K, HE M K. Study on preference of self-developed or third party logistics of e-commerce retail enterprises[J]. Logistics Technology, 2015,34(6): 126-129.
[16] 夏德建,王勇,石国强. 自建VS并购: 物流一体化竞争下的电商平台演化博弈[J]. 中国管理科学,2020,186(4): 125-133.
XIA D J, WANG Y, SHI G Q. Self-construction versus merger and acquisition: evolutionary game of e-commerce platforms on logistics integration competition[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 186(4): 125-133.
[17] 赵旭,汪永,胡斌. 电商平台自建物流与第三方物流企业间的协同配送机制研究[J]. 系统工程,2019,37(2): 81-90.
ZHAO X, WANG Y, HU B. Research on cooperative distribution mechanism between self-built logistics and third party logistics enterprises in e-commerce platform[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 37(2): 81-90.
[18] 唐润,彭洋洋. 考虑渠道特征的生鲜食品供应链双渠道协调演化博弈分析[J]. 统计与决策,2018,34(13): 56-60.
TANG R, PENG Y Y. Evolution game analysis of two-channel coordination in fresh food supply chain considering channel characteristics[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018, 34(13): 56-60.
[19] 冯颖,李智慧,张炎治. 零售商主导下TPL介入的生鲜农产品供应链契约效率评价[J]. 管理评论,2018,30(3): 215-225.
FENG Y, LI Z H, ZHANG Y Z. Contract efficiency evaluation in a fresh agri-products and retailer-led supply chain with TPL's participation[J]. Management Review, 2018, 30(3): 215-225.
[20] 李春发,来茜茜,周驰,等. 处理商主导型手机回收渠道决策演化博弈研究[J]. 软科学,2019,33(10): 93-99.
LI C F, LAI X X, ZHOU C, et al. Research on evolutionary game of mobile phone recycling channel decision dominated by processor[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(10): 93-99.
[21] ZHANG Y J, RONG F, WANG Z. Research on cold chain logistic service pricing-based on tripartite Stackelberg game[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32(1): 213-222.
[22] FRIEDMAN D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrical, 1991, 59(3): 637-666.
[23] VEGA-REDONDO F. Economics and the Theory of Games[M]. England: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 479-527.
[24] 曾佑新,袁盼,张怡雯. 博弈论视角下不同主导权的生鲜电商供应链决策分析[J]. 南京审计大学学报,2019,16(5): 55-64.
ZENG Y X, YUAN P, ZHANG Y W. Decision-making analysis of fresh e-commerce supply chain with different dominant powers from the perspective of game theory[J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2019, 16(5): 55-64.
[1] 谢逢洁, 姚欣, 王思一. 高阶结构对无标度网络上合作行为演化的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 12-19.
[2] 宋美, 王振源, 葛玉辉, 刘举胜. 混合所有制企业高管团队动态合作行为演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 85-91.
[3] 吕洋, 刘忠轶, 张振源, 刘溪溪. 小餐饮商户接入食品安全溯源体系策略博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 145-151.
[4] 陈陶, 冯文刚. 基于演化博弈的民航安检有效性提升研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 77-84.
[5] 姜凤珍, 史晓妮. 社区建成环境改造中居民情绪传染机制及治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 98-106.
[6] 袁亮, 祁煜智, 何伟军, 李闻钦, 吴霞. 跨国界河流水资源冲突演化博弈模拟研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(3): 90-96.
[7] 张骥骧, 陈晓竹. 考虑氮素流通效率的生态补偿策略演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(2): 90-97.
[8] 张鹏, 菅利荣, 王丹丹. 共生网络视角下工业园生态转型治理机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 95-104.
[9] 肖琴, 罗帆. 基于复杂网络的通用航空安全监管演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(3): 33-43.
[10] 彭伟华, 侯仁勇, 李光红. 基于演化博弈的网络平台就业多元协同治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 9-16.
[11] 赵炎, 宾晟, 孙更新. 区块链社交网络中信息传播模型研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 1-8.
[12] 李春发, 刘焕星, 胡培培. 政府分类规制、智能平台赋能与药企CSR策略演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 17-30.
[13] 邓云生, 张纪会. 基于分组选择的可调聚类网络中个体的合作行为研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 39-44.
[14] 王丹丹, 菅利荣, 付帅帅. 战略性新兴产业集群生态链协同运作研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(1): 60-66.
[15] 李春发, 曹颖颖, 王聪, 郝琳娜. 平台规制下直播电商三方策略演化博弈与仿真[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(1): 34-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed