Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2018, Vol. 15 Issue (3): 11-18    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.03.002
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
电力信息相互依存网络与单层电网的级联故障比较
吴凌杰, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 姚飞, 汪洋
广西师范大学电子工程学院,广西 桂林 541004
Comparison of Cascading Failures Between Power Information Interdependent Networks and Single-Layer Power Grids
WU Lingjie, ZOU Yanli, WANG Ruirui, YAO Fei, WANG Yang
College of Electronic Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
全文: PDF(1342 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 电力网络和信息网络深度融合,虽然促进网络间的交流,但也带来故障大规模传播的风险。基于电网结构和负载特性,结合信息网调度功能,构建电力信息相互依存网络模型。使用最高负载、最低负载和最高容量比3种节点攻击方式攻击电网单一节点,并与单层电网故障进行比较。研究表明,在最高负载节点攻击下,初始负载较小时,电力信息相互依存网络的鲁棒性比单层电网弱,当初始负载较大时,两种网络鲁棒性接近;在最低负载和最高容量比节点攻击下,两种网络的鲁棒性差异并不明显;在相互依存网络上,最高负载节点攻击的级联故障最难完全消除。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴凌杰
邹艳丽
王瑞瑞
姚飞
汪洋
吴凌杰
邹艳丽
王瑞瑞
姚飞
汪洋
关键词 电力信息相互依存网络复杂网络鲁棒性级联故障节点攻击    
Abstract:The deep integration of electricity network and information networks can promote communication between networks, but also brings the risk of large-scale transmission of failures. Based on the grid structure and load characteristics, combined with the dispatching function of information network, we construct a "power-information interdependence network" model. Three types of node attack methods are applied to attack a single node of the power grid where the attacked node is the highest load node, the lowest load node or the highest capacity proportion node. The cascade effects are compared with single-layer power grid. Study shows that the robustness of the power information interdependent network is weaker than that of the single-layer power grid under the highest load node attack when the initial load is small. The robustness of the two kinds of networks approaches each other when the initial load is large. The difference in robustness of the two kinds of networks is not obvious at the lowest load node and highest capacity proportion node attack. On the interdependent network, the cascading failure caused by the highest load node attack is the most difficult to eliminate completely.
Key wordspower-information interdependence network    complex network    robustness    cascade failure    node attack
收稿日期: 2018-08-06      出版日期: 2019-01-31
:  TM743  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(11562003);广西多源信息挖掘与安全重点实验室系统性研究课题基金(13-A-02-03)
通讯作者: 邹艳丽(1972-),女,河北沧州人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为基于复杂网络理论的电力网络同步及稳定性。   
作者简介: 吴凌杰(1994-),男,浙江丽水人,硕士研究生,主研方向为复杂网络理论及其应用。
引用本文:   
吴凌杰, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 姚飞, 汪洋. 电力信息相互依存网络与单层电网的级联故障比较[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 11-18.
WU Lingjie, ZOU Yanli, WANG Ruirui, YAO Fei, WANG Yang. Comparison of Cascading Failures Between Power Information Interdependent Networks and Single-Layer Power Grids[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(3): 11-18.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2018.03.002      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V15/I3/11
[1]傅杰, 邹艳丽, 谢蓉. 基于复杂网络理论的电力网络关键线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2017,14(3):91-96.
Fu Jie, Zou Yanli, Xie Rong. The critical lines identification of the power grid based on the complex network theory[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2017,14(3):91-96.
[2]曾辉,孙峰,李铁,等.澳大利亚“9·28”大停电事故分析及对中国启示[J].电力系统自动化,2017,41(13):1-6.
Zeng Hui, Sun Feng, Li Tie, et al. Analysis of “9·28” blackout in south australia and its enlightenment to china[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(13):1-6.
[3]Shao J, Buldyrev S V, Havlin S, et al. Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependence relations[J]. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2011, 83(2):036116.
[4]Watts D J. A simple model of global cascades on random networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002 ,99(9):5766-5771.
[5]Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized criticality:an explanation o the 1/f noise[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1987,59(4):381-384.
[6]Dobson I, Carreras B A, Lynac V E, et al. An initial model for complex dynamics in electric power system blackouts[C]∥34th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. Maui, Hawaii, United States: IEEE, 2001:710-718.
[7]Chassin D P, Posse C. Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabasi-Albert network model[J]. Physica A, 2005,355(2/4):667-677.
[8]Lo C H, Ansari N. Decentralized controls and communications for autonomous distribution networks in smart grid[J].IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(1):66-77.
[9]Zhang X, Liu D, Zhan C, et al. Effects of cyber coupling on cascading failures in power systems[J].IEEE Journal on Emerging & Selected Topics in Circuits & Systems, 2017, 7(2):228-238.
[10] Yang Y, Nishikawa T, Motter A E. Small vulnerable sets determine large network cascades in power grids[J]. Science, 2018, 358(6365):3184.
[11] Buldyrev S V, Al E. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J]. Nature, 2010, 464(8932):1025-1028.
[12] Korkali M, Veneman J G, Tivnan B F, et al. Reducing cascading failure risk by increasing infrastructure network interdependence[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:44499.
[13] 冀星沛,王波,董朝阳,等.电力信息-物理相互依存网络脆弱性评估及加边保护策略[J].电网技术,2016,40(6):1-7.
Ji Xingpei, Wang Bo, Dong Chaoyang, et al.Vulnerability evaluation and link addition protection strategy research of electrical cyber-14 physical interdependent networks[J].Power System Technology, 2016, 40(6):1-7.
[14] Chen Z, Wu J, Xia Y, et al. Robustness of interdependent power grids and communication networks : a complex network perspective[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs, 2017, (99):1-1.
[15] 董政呈,方彦军,田猛.不同耦合方式和耦合强度对电力-通信耦合网络的影响[J].高电压技术,2015,41(10):3464-3469.
Dong Zhengcheng,Fang Yanjun,Tian Meng. Influences of various coupled patterns and coupling strength on power-communication coupled networks[J].High Voltage Engineering, 2015,41(10):3464-3469.
[16] Wei D Q, Luo X S, Zhang B. Analysis of cascading failure in complex power networks under the load local preferential redistribution rule [J].Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2012, 391(8):2771-2777.
[17] Kinney R, Crucitti P, Albert R. Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid [J]. The European Physical Journal B, 2005, 46(1):101-107.
[18] Wang W X, Chen G R. Universal robustness characteristic of weighted networks against cascading failure [J]. Physical Review E, 2008, 77(2):026101.
[19] Bao Z J, Cao Y J, Ding L J, et al. Comparison of cascading failures in small-world and scale-free networks subject to vertex and edge attacks[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2009, 388(20):4491-4498.
[20] 张喜平, 李永树, 刘刚,等. 节点重要度贡献的复杂网络节点重要度评估方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2014, 11(3):26-32.
Zhang Xiping, Li Yongshu, Liu Gang, et al. Evaluation method of complex network node importance based on node importance contribution[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2014, 11(3): 26-32.
[1] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[2] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[3] 潘文祥, 李东艳, 孙思翔, 佟宁. 一种基于社团外围节点的网络鲁棒性优化策略[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 70-78.
[4] 胡金梅, 邹艳丽, 王鸿俊, 张海. 基于二阶邻居负载再分配的电网级联故障研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 1-9.
[5] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[6] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[7] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[8] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[9] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[10] 余文倩, 马福祥, 陈阳, 马秀娟. 基于自适应的高阶网络鲁棒性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 15-23.
[11] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[12] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[13] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[14] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[15] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed