Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2015, Vol. 12 Issue (3): 91-95    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2015.03.014
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于复合策略的社会学习模型
刘坤坤, 魏新江, 方爱丽
鲁东大学数学与统计科学学院,山东 烟台 264025
A Social Learning Model Based on Composite Strategy
LIU Kunkun, WEI Xinjiang, FANG Aili
School of Mathematics and Statistics Science, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
全文: PDF(680 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了研究在复杂社会网络环境中的社会学习,考虑到社会个体的异质性和复杂性,提出一种基于复合策略进行信念更新的社会学习模型。模型中的个体在每一时刻,以一定概率任意选择基于贝叶斯法则的更新策略或基于邻居信念的更新策略中的一种策略进行信念更新。仿真结果表明,在满足策略选择概率大于0等条件下,社会个体最终都能够达到渐近学习,并且学习速度与策略选择概率是相关的,策略选择概率取值越大,学习速度越快。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘坤坤
魏新江
方爱丽
关键词 社会学习复杂网络复合策略    
Abstract:In order to study social learning in complex social networks, a social learning model based on composite belief update strategy is proposed by considering the heterogeneity and complexity of the social individuals. At each time step, individuals in the model choose Bayesian update strategy or the update strategy based on their neighbors’ beliefs according to the strategy selection probability. The simulation results show that under some conditions such as the positive strategy selection probability, all the social individuals can achieve asymptotic learning. Furthermore, the learning speed is relative to the strategy selection probability, the larger the strategy selection probability is, the faster the learning speed will be.
Key wordssocial learning    complex networks    composite strategy
收稿日期: 2014-11-07      出版日期: 2026-06-22
ZTFLH:  N949  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(61374108);山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金(BS2011DX006)
通讯作者: 方爱丽(1971-),女,山东蓬莱人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为复杂系统与复杂网络。   
作者简介: 刘坤坤(1987-),男,山东枣庄人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为概率论与数理统计。
引用本文:   
刘坤坤, 魏新江, 方爱丽. 基于复合策略的社会学习模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2015, 12(3): 91-95.
LIU Kunkun, WEI Xinjiang, FANG Aili. A Social Learning Model Based on Composite Strategy[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2015, 12(3): 91-95.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2015.03.014      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2015/V12/I3/91
[1] Albert B. Social learning Theory[M]. London: Prentice Hall, 1976.
[2] Lee I. On the convergence of informational cascades[J]. The Journal of Economic Theory, 1993, 61(2): 395-411.
[3] Tsitsiklis J N, Athans M. Convergence and asymptotic agreement in distributed decision probl-ems[C]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1984, 29(8): 690-696.
[4] Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W. Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private information[J]. Econometrica, 1997, 65(5): 1029-1058.
[5] Foster A, Rosenzweig M. Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(6): 1176-1209.
[6] Celen B, Kariv S. Observational learning under imperfect information[J].Games and Economic Behavior, 2004, 47(1): 72-86.
[7] Borkar V, Varaiya P. Asymptotic agreement in distributed estimation[C]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1982, 27: 650-655.
[8] Udry C, Conley T. Social learning through networks: the adoption of new agricultural technologies in ghana[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 83(3): 668-673.
[9] Banerjee A. A simple model of herd behavior[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107(3): 797-817.
[10] Smith L, Sørensen P. Pathological outcomes of observational learning[J]. Econometrica, 2000, 68(2): 371-398.
[11] Gale D, Kariv S. Bayesian learning in social networks[J].Games and Economic Behavior, 2003, 45(2): 329-346.
[12] Banerjee A, Fudenberg D. Word-of-mouth learning[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2004, 46(1):1-22
[13] Celen B, Kariv S. An experimental test of observational learning under imperfect information[J]. Economic Theory, 2005,26(3): 677-699.
[14] Montrey M R, Shultz T R. Evolution of social learning strategies[C]. 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and learning, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2010: 95-100.
[15] DeGroot M H. Reaching a consensus[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974, 69(345): 118-121.
[16] Ellision Glenn, Fudenberg D. Rules of thumb for social iearning[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(4): 612-643.
[17] Ellision Glenn, Fudenberg D. Word-of-mouth communication and social learning[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(1): 93-125.
[18] Bala V, Goyal S. Learning from neighbors[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65(3):595-621.
[19] Bala V, Goyal S. Conformism and diversity under social learning[J]. Economic Theory, 2001, 17(1): 101-120.
[20] Golub B, Jackson M. Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds[J]. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2010, 2(1): 112-149.
[21] Jadbabaie A, Molavi P, Sandroni A, et al. Non-Bayesian social learning[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2012, 76(1): 210-225.
[1] 岳芳, 张涵, 樊茂瑞, 戴文慧, 郭剑锋. 开放式交互平台知识协同中的群体观点演化模型与实证[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(2): 8-18.
[2] 孙艳琴, 吴怀宇, 陈志环. 异维异构多重边复杂网络的广义外同步控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(2): 34-40.
[3] 于海波, 高彦丽, 陈世明, 凤超. 异质耦合下铁路-经济多层网络鲁棒性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(2): 48-56.
[4] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[5] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[6] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[7] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[8] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[9] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[10] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[11] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[12] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[13] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[14] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[15] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed