Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2021, Vol. 18 Issue (4): 21-29    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2021.04.003
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
确定性社会影响力竞争扩散问题研究
翁克瑞, 沈卉, 侯俊东
中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院,武汉 430078
On the Deterministic Competitive Diffusion of Social Influence
WENG Kerui, SHEN Hui, HOU Jundong
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
全文: PDF(1401 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对存在于社交网络中多种产品的对抗营销及多种信息竞争传播等场景,考虑竞争与确定性因素,研究确定性社会影响力竞争扩散问题,构建了该问题的整数规划模型,并设计了大规模求解算法。实验结果表明基于扩散信息的边际影响力纠正算法展现了良好的可扩展性与稳定性,求解质量领先度数下降等算法20%以上,求解时间只占贪婪算法、商业软件时间成本极小比例。为企业在竞争扩散中的实际应用提供了可行的优化方案。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
翁克瑞
沈卉
侯俊东
翁克瑞
沈卉
侯俊东
关键词 竞争扩散社交网络影响力最大化阈值模型复杂网络    
Abstract:In view of the competitive marketing of various products and the competitive dissemination of various information in social networks, the deterministic social influence maximization problem was studied considering the competitive and deterministic factors, and the integer programming model of the problem was constructed, and the large-scale approaching algorithm was designed. The experimental results showed that the marginal influence correction algorithm based on diffusion information showed good scalability and stability, and the reduction of the leading degree of solving quality was more than 20%. The solving time only accounted for a small proportion of the time cost of greedy algorithm and commercial software. It provides a feasible optimization scheme for the practical application of enterprises in the diffusion of competition.
Key wordscompetitive diffusion    social networks    influence maximization    threshold model    complex networks
收稿日期: 2020-10-16      出版日期: 2021-11-30
:  N94  
  O22  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71874163)
通讯作者: 沈卉(1996-),女,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为社会网络分析。   
作者简介: 翁克瑞(1979-),男,浙江温州人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为物流网络设计。
引用本文:   
翁克瑞, 沈卉, 侯俊东. 确定性社会影响力竞争扩散问题研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(4): 21-29.
WENG Kerui, SHEN Hui, HOU Jundong. On the Deterministic Competitive Diffusion of Social Influence[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2021, 18(4): 21-29.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2021.04.003      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V18/I4/21
[1]Domingos P, Richardson M. Mining the network value of customers[C].Proceeding of the seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA,2001: 57-66.
[2]Richardson M, Domingos P. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing[C].Proceeding of the eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA,2002: 61-70.
[3]Kempe D,Kleinberg J, Tardos E. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network[C].Proceeding of the ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA, 2003: 137-146.
[4]Leskovec J, Krause A, Guestrin C, et al. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks[C].Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA, 2007: 420-429.
[5]Goyal A, Lu W, Lakshmanan L V. Celf++: optimizing the greedy algorithm for influence maximization in social networks[C].Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. New York, USA,2011: 47-48.
[6]Kimura M, Saito K. Tractable Models for Information Diffusion in Social Networks[M]. Germany: Springer, 2006: 59-271.
[7]Chen W, Yuan Y, Zhang L. Scalable influence maximization in social networks under the linear threshold model[C].2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Mining.Sydney,Australia, 2010: 88-97.
[8]Wang C, Chen W, Wang Y. Scalable influence maximization for independent cascade model in large-scale social networks[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2012, 25(3): 545-576.
[9]Goyal A, Lu W, Lakshmanan L V. Simpath: an efficient algorithm for influence maximization under the linear threshold model[C].2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011: 211-220.
[10] Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S. Efficient influence maximization in social networks[C].Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA,2009: 199-208.
[11] Daliri Khomami M M, Rezvanian A, Bagherpour N, et al. Minimum positive influence dominating set and its application in influence maximization: a learning automata approach[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48(3): 570-593.
[12] Bozorgi A, Haghighi H, Zahedi M S, et al. INCIM: a community-based algorithm for influence maximization problem under the linear threshold model[J]. Information Processing and Management, 2016, 52(6): 1188-1199.
[13] Shang J, Zhou S, Li X, et al. CoFIM: a community-based framework for influence maximization on large-scale networks[J].Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 117(FEB): 88-100.
[14] Cui L, Hu H, Yu S, et al. DDSE: a novel evolutionary algorithm based on degree-descending search strategy for influence maximization in social networks[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2018, 103(FEB): 119-130.
[15] Gong M, Yan J, Shen B, et al. Influence maximization in social networks based on discrete particle swarm optimization[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 367-368: 600-614.
[16] Borgs C, Brautbar M, Chayes J, et al. Maximizing social influence in nearly optimal time[C]. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Philadelphia, USA,2014: 946-957.
[17] Lu W, Chen W, Lakshmanan L V S. From competition to complementarity: comparative influence diffusion and maximization[C].Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Kohala Coast,Hawaii,2015: 60-71.
[18] Ou H, Chou C, Chen M. Influence maximization for complementary goods: why parties fail to cooperate?[C].Proceeding of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.New York, USA,2016: 1713-1722.
[19] Borodin A. Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks[C].Internet and Network Economics. Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010: 539-550.
[20] Lu W, Bonchi F, Goyal A, et al. The bang for the buck: fair competitive viral marketing from the host perspective[C].Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.New York, USA, 2013: 928-936.
[21] Bozorgi A, Samet S, Kwisthout J, et al. Community-based influence maximization in social networks under a competitive linear threshold model[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 134: 149-158.
[22] Swaminathan A. An algorithm for influence maximization and target set selection for the deterministic linear threshold model[J]. Current Opinion in Immunology, 2014,12(1):59.
[23] Albert R, Barab A. Statistical mechanics of complex networks[J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74(1): 47.
[1] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[2] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[3] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[4] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[5] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[6] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[7] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[8] 丁学君, 洪野, 田勇. 考虑促谣及辟谣的在线社交网络谣言传播模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 46-54.
[9] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[10] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[11] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[12] 王志萍, 赵嘉乐, 刘凯, 张海峰. 基于遗传算法的低冗余超图影响力最大化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 97-104.
[13] 向宇平, 许小可. 基于异质模体特征的社交网络用户性别识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 105-112.
[14] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[15] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed