Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2022, Vol. 19 Issue (3): 20-26    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.03.003
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
FPGA芯片产业链及知识转移网络特征分析
肖瑶1, 李守伟2, 王怡涵2
1.南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,南京 210044;
2.山东师范大学商学院,济南 250358
Characteristics Analysis of FPGA Industry Chain and Knowledge Transfer Network
XIAO Yao1, LI Shouwei2, WANG Yihan2
1. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing 210044,China;
2. School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Ji′nan 250300, China
全文: PDF(1628 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为厘清集成电路细分领域现场可编程门阵列(英文简称“FPGA”)国产化过程中产业链定位,优化该产业知识转移网络,提出产业链分析模型,用复杂网络分析法构建知识转移网络,分析网络结构特征。结果表明:中国在产业链中占据份额低,发展不平衡。知识转移网络围绕核心企业展开,具有小世界特征并服从幂律分布,核心节点对产业进化有重大影响。基于网络优化视角提出建立现代化知识转移网络发展体系,形成覆盖全产业链的国际竞争新优势等政策建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
肖瑶
李守伟
王怡涵
肖瑶
李守伟
王怡涵
关键词 产业链集成电路产业知识转移复杂网络    
Abstract:To clarify the positioning of the industrial chain of FPGA (Field programmable gate array) during the localization process, and to optimize the knowledge transfer network, the article proposes has the analytical models in the industrial chains, and the creation of the knowledge transfer network using complex network analysis method and the analysis of network structural features. The results have demonstrated that China occupies a low share in the industrial chains and its development is also unbalanced. The knowledge transfer network mainly focuses on the core enterprises characterized by small world and following power-law distribution. Core nodes exert a significant impact on the industrial evolution. Based on the perspective of network optimization, this paper puts forward policy suggestions such as establishing a modern knowledge transfer network development system and forming a new international competitive advantage covering the whole industrial chain.
Key wordsindustrial chain    integrated circuit industry    knowledge transfer    complex network
收稿日期: 2021-06-12      出版日期: 2022-10-12
:  F272.3  
基金资助:国家社会科学基金(17BGL001);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2019MG015)
通讯作者: 李守伟(1970-),男,山东临沂人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为创新网络与智能算法。   
作者简介: 肖瑶(1995-),女,山东枣庄人,硕士,科研助理,主要研究方向为创新网络与智能算法。
引用本文:   
肖瑶, 李守伟, 王怡涵. FPGA芯片产业链及知识转移网络特征分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(3): 20-26.
XIAO Yao, LI Shouwei, WANG Yihan. Characteristics Analysis of FPGA Industry Chain and Knowledge Transfer Network[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2022, 19(3): 20-26.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.03.003      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V19/I3/20
[1] 钱晓东,杨贝. 基于复杂网络模型的供应链企业合作演化研究[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(3): 1-10.
QIAN X D, YANG B. Supply chain enterprise cooperation evolution based on complex network model[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(3): 1-10.
[2] 阮平南,栾梦雪,魏云凤,等. 创新网络组织间知识转移影响因素元分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(18): 7-14.
RUAN P N, LUAN M X, WEI Y F, et al. The influencing factors of knowledge transfer in innovation network: a meta-analysis[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(18): 7-14.
[3] 张梦晓,高良谋. 驱动与阻碍: 网络位置影响知识转移的系统动力学研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22): 135-142.
ZHANG M X, GAO L M. Drivers and hindrances: system dynamics study of network position affecting knowledge transfer[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2019,36(22):135-142.
[4] 向希尧,裴云龙. 基于情境的多维接近性与知识流动[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(4): 554-560.
XIANG X Y, PEI Y L. Multi-dimensional proximity and knowledge flows: a context-based theoretical frame[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017, 14(4): 554-560.
[5] GRANT R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 109-122.
[6] SPENDER J C, GRANT R M. Knowledge and the firm: overview[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 5-9.
[7] LIEBOWITZ J. Knowledge Retention: Strategies and Solutions[M]. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications, 2008.
[8] TEECE D J, PISANO G, SHUEN A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7):509-533.
[9] 王婷,杨建君.组织控制协同使用、知识转移与新产品创造力——被调节的中介研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(3): 34-49.
WANG T, YANG J J. The combined use of organizational cintrols, knowledge transfer, new product creativity: a research of moderated mediator effects[J]. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2018, 39(3): 34-49.
[10] 张保仓,任浩. 虚拟组织知识资源获取对持续创新能力的作用机制研究[J].管理学报, 2018, 15(7): 1009-1017.
ZHANG B C, REN H. An empirical study on mechanism of action of organization knowledge resource acquisition to continuous innovation capability[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15(7): 1009-1017.
[11] 李丹,杨建君,赵璐.企业间知识库兼容性、知识转移与企业知识创造绩效:双边关系质量的调节机制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(5): 141-150.
LI D, YANG J J, ZHAO L. Knowledge creation performance, knowledge transfer and new knowledge creation rerformance: moderation paths of inter-firm relational quality[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(5): 141-150.
[12] 米捷,林润辉,董坤祥,等.OFDI企业与本土集群企业知识共享的演化博弈分析——基于知识位势的视角[J].管理评论, 2016, 28(9): 106-120.
MI J, LIN R H, DONG K X, et al. An evolutionary game analysis on knowledge sharing among ofdi corporation and local cluster enterprises: based on the perspective of knowledge potential[J]. Management Review, 2016, 28(9): 106-120.
[13] 康鑫,赵丹妮.知识势差、知识隐匿与知识进化:组织惰性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(6):122-130.
KANG X, ZHAO D N. Knowledge potential, knowledge hiding and knowledge evolution: the moderation role of organizational inertia[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(6): 122-130.
[14] 郭韬,邢璐,黄瑶. 创新网络知识转移对企业创新绩效的影响——双元创新的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(15): 114-119.
GUO T, XING L, HUANG Y. Study on the influence of knowledge transfer of innovation networks on firms′ innovation performance-the intermediary role of ambidextrous innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(15): 114-119.
[15] 陈伟,杨早立,张永超.网络结构与企业核心能力关系实证研究:基于知识共享与知识整合中介效应视角[J].管理评论, 2014, 26(6):74-82.
CHEN W, YANG Z L, ZHANG Y C. The empirical research on the relationship among network structure and core capability: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and knowledge integration[J]. Management Review, 2014, 26(6): 74-82.
[16] WANG L Y,WANG Y,LOU Y, et al. Impact of different patent cooperation network models on innovation performance of technology-based SMEs[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2020, 32(6): 724-738.
[17] 李守伟. 知识转移对企业创新能力的影响研究——网络中心性的调节作用[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(18): 164-171.
LI S W. Research on the influence of knowledge transfer on enterprise′s innovation capability: the moderating role of network centrality[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(18): 164-171.
[18] 杨宝莹,胡延庆.统计推断方法在复杂网络中的应用[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2014,11(1):67-76.
YANG B Y, HU Y Q. The application of statistical inference in complex networks[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2014, 11(1): 67-76.
[1] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[2] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[3] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[4] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[5] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[6] 刘晓燕, 赵曦雨, 单晓红, 谢桂生. 集成电路产业创新合作关系瓦解因素探析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 29-36.
[7] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[8] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[9] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[10] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[11] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[12] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[13] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
[14] 李伟莎, 王淑良, 宋博. 基于强化学习风电并网策略下的韧性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 128-134.
[15] 张耀波, 张胜, 王雨萱, 熊聪源. 基于K-shell的复杂网络簇生长维数研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 11-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed