Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2023, Vol. 20 Issue (1): 9-17    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2023.01.002
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于最优路径相似度传输矩阵的链路预测方法
李巧丽, 韩华, 李秋晖, 曾茜
武汉理工大学理学院,武汉 430070
Link Prediction Method Based on Optimal Path Similarity Transfer Matrix
LI Qiaoli, HAN Hua, LI Qiuhui, ZENG Xi
Department of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
全文: PDF(1330 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为解决现有的基于相似性的链路预测方法忽略了最优路径在节点间传递相似性的能力的问题,提出一种基于最优路径相似度传输矩阵的链路预测方法。首先,分析节点间最优路径对信息传输能力的影响,进而对节点间紧密中心性进行定义;其次,依据最优路径数和中心性构建相似度传输矩阵,综合节点间局部信息和全局属性衡量节点间相似度。最后,将所提方法与其他相似性指标,在6个真实网络上进行实证对比研究。结果表明,所提算法预测精度较高,且算法更加稳定。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李巧丽
韩华
李秋晖
曾茜
李巧丽
韩华
李秋晖
曾茜
关键词 复杂网络链路预测最优路径相似度传输矩阵相似性度量中心性    
Abstract:The current similarity-based link prediction methods ignore the ability of the optimal path to transfer similarity between nodes. To solve this problem, a link prediction method based on the optimal path similarity transmission matrix is proposed. Firstly, the influence of the optimal path between nodes on the information transmission capacity is analyzed, then the tight centrality between nodes is defined; secondly, the number of optimal paths and centrality is used to construct the similarity transmission matrix, and the local information between nodes and global attributes are integrated to evaluate the similarity between nodes. Finally, the proposed method is compared with other similarity-based algorithms in six real networks. The results show that the proposed algorithm has more accurate prediction accuracy and is more stable.
Key wordscomplex networks    link prediction    optimal path    similarity transfer matrix    similarity measurement    centrality
收稿日期: 2021-10-23      出版日期: 2023-04-19
:  TP393  
  N94  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(111701435);国家自然科学基金(12071364)
通讯作者: 韩华(1975),女,山东烟台人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为复杂性分析与评价、经济控制与决策。   
作者简介: 李巧丽(1991),女,河南平舆人,硕士,主要研究方向为复杂网络动力学、链路预测。
引用本文:   
李巧丽, 韩华, 李秋晖, 曾茜. 基于最优路径相似度传输矩阵的链路预测方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 9-17.
LI Qiaoli, HAN Hua, LI Qiuhui, ZENG Xi. Link Prediction Method Based on Optimal Path Similarity Transfer Matrix[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2023, 20(1): 9-17.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2023.01.002      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I1/9
[1] GUL H, AMIN A, ADNAN A, et al. A systematic analysis of link prediction in complex network[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 2053120541.
[2] BRUGERE I, GALLAGHER B, BERGER-WOLF T Y. Network structure inference, a survey: motivations, methods, and applications[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2018, 51(2): 139.
[3] ZHOU T, LÜ L Y, ZHANG Y C. Predicting missing links via local information[J]. European Physical Journal B, 2009, 71(4): 623630.
[4] CANNISTRACI C V, ALANIS-LOBATO G, RAVASI T. From link-prediction in brain connectomes and protein interactomes to the local-community-paradigm in complex networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3(4): 16131613.
[5] ASSOULI N, BENAHMED K, GASBAOUI B. How to predict crime informatics-inspired approach from link prediction[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021(8): 125143.
[6] LORRAIN F, WHITE H C. Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks[J]. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1971, 1(1): 4980.
[7] ADAMIC L A, ADAR E. Friends and neighbors on the Web[J]. Social Networks, 2003, 25(3): 211230.
[8] KATZ L. A new status index derived from sociometric index[J]. Psychometrika, 1953, 18(1): 3943.
[9] WU J H, SHEN J, ZHOU B, et al. General link prediction with influential node identification[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 523( 6): 9961007.
[10] KUMAR A, SINGH S S, SINGH K, et al. Level-2 node clustering coefficient-based link prediction[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2019, 49(7): 27622779.
[11] YIN H, BENSON A R, LESKOVEC J. Higher-order clustering in networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2018, 97(5): 052306.
[12] 顾秋阳, 吴宝, 池仁勇. 基于高阶路径相似度的复杂网络链路预测方法[J]. 通信学报, 2021, 42(7): 6169.
GU Q Y, WU B, CHI R Y. Link prediction method based on the similarity of high path[J]. Journal on Communications, 2021, 42(7): 6169.
[13] YANG J, ZHANG X D. Predicting missing links in complex networks based on common neighbors and distance[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 110.
[14] AHMAD I, AKHTAR M U, NOOR S, et al. Missing link prediction using common neighbor and centrality based paramete-rized algorithm[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 19.
[15] 胡钢, 高浩, 徐翔, 等. 基于重要度传输矩阵的复杂网络节点重要性辨识方法[J]. 电子学报, 2020, 48(12): 24022408.
HU G, GAO H, XU X, et al. Importance identification method of complex network nodes based on importance transfer matrix[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2020, 48(12): 24022408.
[16] KLEIN D J, RANDIC M. Resistance distance[J]. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1993, 12(1): 8195.
[17] FOUSS F, PIROTTE A, RENDERS J M, et al. Random- walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2007, 19(3): 355369.
[18] BAO Z K, MA C, XIANG B B, et al. Identification of influential nodes in complex networks: method from spreading probability viewpoint[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 468: 391397.
[19] GRIFFITH D A, CHUN Y. Spatial autocorrelation in spatial interactions models: geographic scale and resolution implications for network resilience and vulnerability[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2015, 15(2): 337365.
[20] 周丽娜, 李发旭, 巩云超, 等. 基于K-shell的超网络关键节点识别方法[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2021, 18(3): 1522.
ZHOU L N, LI F X, GONG Y C, et al. Identification methods of vital nodes based on K-shell in hypernetworks[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2021, 18(3): 1522.
[21] 郭世泽, 陆哲明. 复杂网络基础理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[22] KUMAR A, MISHRA S, SINGH S S, et al. Link prediction in complex networks based on significance of higher-order path index (SHOPI)[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 545: 123790.
[23] ZHOU T, Lee Y L, Wang G. Experimental analyses on 2-hop-based and 3-hop-based link prediction algorithms[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2021, 564: 125532.
[24] LUSSEAU D, SCHNEIDER K, BOISSEAU O J, et al. The bottlenose dolphin community of doubtful sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations[J]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2003, 54(4): 396405.
[25] MILO, R. ITZKOVITZ S, KASHTAN N, et al. Superfamilies of evolved and designednetworks[J]. Science, 2004, 303(5663): 15381542.
[26] ZENG A, LIU W. Enhancing network robustness against malicious attacks[J]. Physical Review E, 2012, 85(6): 066130.
[27] GUIMERA R, DANON L, DIAZ-GUILERA A, et al. Self-similar community structure in a network of human interactions[J]. Physical Review E, 2003, 68(6): 065103.
[28] ADAMIC L A, GLANCE N. The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, Chicago. USA, 2005: 3643.
[1] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[2] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[3] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[4] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[5] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[6] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[7] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[8] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[9] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[10] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[11] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[12] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
[13] 李伟莎, 王淑良, 宋博. 基于强化学习风电并网策略下的韧性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 128-134.
[14] 张耀波, 张胜, 王雨萱, 熊聪源. 基于K-shell的复杂网络簇生长维数研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 11-17.
[15] 詹秀秀, 叶涛, 刘闯, 刘雪梅. 农产品贸易网络中国家影响力分析与研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 26-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed