Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2024, Vol. 21 Issue (2): 129-136    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.02.016
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
药品安全治理演化博弈及策略研究
谢振雨, 万安霞
南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,南京 210044
Research on Evolutionary Game and Strategy of Drug Safety Governance
XIE Zhenyu, WAN Anxia
School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
全文: PDF(5524 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 针对药品安全治理中信息不对称和主体行为隐蔽等导致的规制俘获问题,利用演化博弈理论构建了三方演化博弈模型,模型包括国家药监局、地方药监局和药品生产企业三方。计算了演化稳定策略(ESS)并进行仿真分析。研究发现各参数对药监局被规制俘获的影响,并重点分析了国家药监局对地方药监局和药品生产企业的惩罚力度参数,基于结果从政府角度提出了药品安全治理的相关建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谢振雨
万安霞
关键词 药品安全治理规制俘获主体行为演化博弈    
Abstract:This paper tries address the problem of regulatory capture in drug safety governance resulting from information asymmetry and hidden behavior of subjects. To achieve this, this paper employs evolutionary game theory to construct a three-party evolutionary game model that includes the State Drug Administration, the local Drug Administration, and the drug manufacturer. Then the Evolutionary Stability Strategies (ESS) are obtained, and a simulation analysis is conducted to analyze the impact of each parameter on the regulatory capture of the drug administrations. In addition, this paper focuses on the effects of the penalty intensity of the State Drug Administration on the local Drug Administration and drug manufacturers. Based on the findings, recommendations are provided for the government.
Key wordsdrug safety governance    regulatory capture    subjects’ behaviors    evolutionary game
收稿日期: 2022-06-09      出版日期: 2024-07-17
ZTFLH:  R95  
  F224  
基金资助:教育部人文社科项目(20YJAZH096)
通讯作者: 万安霞(1971-),女,山东济宁人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为公共管理,管理方法。   
作者简介: 第一作者: 谢振雨(1998-),女,江苏淮安人,硕士,主要研究方向为复杂系统仿真。
引用本文:   
谢振雨, 万安霞. 药品安全治理演化博弈及策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 129-136.
XIE Zhenyu, WAN Anxia. Research on Evolutionary Game and Strategy of Drug Safety Governance[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2024, 21(2): 129-136.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2024.02.016      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I2/129
[1]国家药品监督管理局. 2020年度全国各级药品监督管理部门查处制售假劣药品情况[EB/OL]. (2021-05-20) [2022-04-22]. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/yaowen/ypjgyw/20210520090407169.html.
State Drug Administration. The nantional drug regulatory department departments at all levels investigated and dealt with the production and sale of fake and inferior drugs in 2020[EB/OL]. (2021-05-20) [2022-04-22]. https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/yaowen/ypjgyw/2021052009040-7169.html.
[2]张新鑫, 侯文华, 申成霖, 等. 集中采购参与意愿、制药企业议价能力与药品市场绩效[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 113-122.
ZHANG X X, HOU W H, SHEN C L, et al. Willingness to participate in centralized procurement, bargaining power of pharmaceutical enterprises and drug market performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(7): 113-122.
[3]史武男, 杨秀云. 集中采购制度改革能提高我国药品质量吗[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 429(8): 41-53.
SHI W N, YANG X Y. Can the reform of centralized procurement system improve the quality of drugs in China[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 429(8): 41-53.
[4]胡颖廉. 产业安全和质量安全:中国药品监管体制改革的逻辑[J]. 社会科学战线, 2016, 253(7): 207-215.
HU Y L. Industrial safety and quality safety: the logic of China′s drug regulatory system reform[J]. Social Science Front, 2016,253(7): 207-215.
[5]张潮, 王晓莉. 从政府管理到社会治理:食品安全监管的政府职能转变与实践逻辑[J]. 科学社会主义, 2016, 170(2): 96-101.
ZHANG C, WANG X L. From government management to social governance: The transformation of government functions and practical logic of food safety supervision[J]. Scientific Socialism, 2016,170(2): 96-101.
[6]胡重明. 任务环境、大部制改革与地方治理体系的反官僚制化——对浙江省地方食品药品监管体制改革的考察[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016, 376(10): 26-32,60.
HU C M. Task environment, large ministry reform and anti-bureaucracy of local governance system: an investigation on the reform of local food and drug supervision system in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2016,376(10): 26-32,60.
[7]胡颖廉. 综合执法体制和提升食药监管能力的困境[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017, 107(2): 103-107,128.
HU Y L. The dilemma of comprehensive law enforcement system and improving the ability of food and drug supervision[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 2017,107(2): 103-107,128.
[8]杨华锋, 杨蕾. 药品安全治理变革中的协同性——从山东疫苗事件谈起[J]. 新视野, 2017, 204(6): 61-67.
YANG H F, YANG L. Synergy in the reform of drug safety management: from the Shandong vaccine incident[J]. Expanding Horizons, 2017,204(6): 61-67.[9]方俊. 药品安全协同治理的多主体责任落实——基于我国十大典型药害事件的案例分析[J]. 理论探索, 2020, 241(1): 92-97.
FANG J. Multi-subjects′ responsibility of drug safety collaborative governance: based on the case analysis of ten typical drug accidents in China[J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2020,241(1): 92-97.
[10] 刘鹏, 钟光耀. 市场所,还是食药所——基层食药监管体制改革选择的行政逻辑[J]. 学术研究, 2021, 434(1): 39-49,177.
LIU P, ZHONG G Y. Market department or food and drug department: the administrative logic of grass-roots food and drug regulatory systems′ choices in reform[J]. Academic Research, 2021,434(1): 39-49,177.
[11] 朱立龙, 荣俊美. 药品供应链质量投入与政府分层监管策略研究[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(2): 26-31+37.
ZHU L L, RONG J M. Research on quality investment in drug supply chain and government hierarchical supervision strategy[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(2): 26-31+37.
[12] 闫志华, 唐锡晋. 基于演化博弈的药品质量安全监管“人理”分析[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(5): 64-75.
YAN Z H, TANG X J. Analysis on "human principle" of drug quality and safety supervision based on evolutionary game theory[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(5): 64-75.
[13] 唐民皓. 药品安全:从“监管”向“治理”的转型[J]. 财经法学, 2015, 4(4): 40-48.
TANG M H. Drug safety: Transformation from "supervision" to "governance"[J]. Law and Economy, 2015,4(4): 40-48.
[14] 乔大丽. 利益相关者视域下的药品安全社会共治研究[J]. 商业研究, 2020, 516(4): 146-152.
QIAO D L. Research on drug safety and social co governance from the perspective of stakeholders[J]. Commercial Research, 2020,516(4): 146-152.
[15] 杨华锋. 协同治理审视下的药品安全及其治道逻辑[J]. 行政论坛, 2017, 24(2): 118-123.
YANG H F. Drug safety and its governance logic under collaborative governance[J]. Administrative Tribune, 2017, 24(2): 118-123.
[16] 胡颖廉. 行政吸纳市场:我国药品安全与公共卫生的治理困境——以非法疫苗案件为例[J]. 广东社会科学, 2017, 187(5): 9.
HU Y L. Administrative absorption market: the governance dilemma of drug safety and public health in China: a case study of illegal vaccine cases[J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2017,187(5): 9.
[17] FRIEDMAN D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica, 1991, 59(3): 637-666.
[18] LYAPUNOV A M. The general problem of the stability of motion[J]. International journal of control, 1992, 55(3): 531-534.
[1] 杨国忠, 周午阳. 基于供应链视角的企业协同生态创新演化博弈[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 120-128.
[2] 孙威威, 张峥. 基于复杂网络的电动汽车创新扩散博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 45-51.
[3] 王建华, 郝婷婷, 林超英, 朱敏. 政府监管机制下港口企业的社会责任履行研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(2): 147-153.
[4] 李春发, 俎晓彤, 田盖地. 价格竞争、保鲜努力与农产品电商冷链物流模式演化[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 100-108.
[5] 谢逢洁, 姚欣, 王思一. 高阶结构对无标度网络上合作行为演化的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 12-19.
[6] 宋美, 王振源, 葛玉辉, 刘举胜. 混合所有制企业高管团队动态合作行为演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 85-91.
[7] 吕洋, 刘忠轶, 张振源, 刘溪溪. 小餐饮商户接入食品安全溯源体系策略博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2024, 21(1): 145-151.
[8] 姜凤珍, 史晓妮. 社区建成环境改造中居民情绪传染机制及治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 98-106.
[9] 陈陶, 冯文刚. 基于演化博弈的民航安检有效性提升研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(4): 77-84.
[10] 袁亮, 祁煜智, 何伟军, 李闻钦, 吴霞. 跨国界河流水资源冲突演化博弈模拟研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(3): 90-96.
[11] 张骥骧, 陈晓竹. 考虑氮素流通效率的生态补偿策略演化博弈分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(2): 90-97.
[12] 张鹏, 菅利荣, 王丹丹. 共生网络视角下工业园生态转型治理机制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2023, 20(1): 95-104.
[13] 肖琴, 罗帆. 基于复杂网络的通用航空安全监管演化博弈研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(3): 33-43.
[14] 赵炎, 宾晟, 孙更新. 区块链社交网络中信息传播模型研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 1-8.
[15] 彭伟华, 侯仁勇, 李光红. 基于演化博弈的网络平台就业多元协同治理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(2): 9-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed