Please wait a minute...
文章检索
复杂系统与复杂性科学  2022, Vol. 19 Issue (4): 1-6    DOI: 10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.04.001
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于复杂网络理论的电力网络抗毁性分析
郭明健, 高岩
上海理工大学系统科学系,上海 200093
Invulnerability Analysis of Power Network Based on Complex Network
GUO Mingjian, GAO Yan
Department of Systems Science, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
全文: PDF(1464 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 抗毁性分析是电网安全研究的核心内容之一,因传统分析方法无法有效分析故障产生的过程,对研究抗毁性存在局限性,基于复杂网络理论研究电力网络的抗毁性并以上海市崇明区为例实证分析。对电力网络随机攻击和蓄意攻击,得出攻击后网络效率和最大连通子图数量变化,并提出网络效率变化率作为评估抗毁性的参数。根据仿真结果,提出一种基于实时接近中心性优先攻击策略的分段式保护方案,提高电力网络的抗毁性,以保证电网安全。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郭明健
高岩
郭明健
高岩
关键词 电力系统抗毁性复杂网络网络效率接近中心性    
Abstract:Invulnerability analysis is one of the core contents of power grid security research. Traditional analysis methods cannot effectively analyze the process of failure generation, and have limitations in the research of invulnerability analysis. This paper studies the invulnerability analysis of power networks based on complex network theory, and conducts an empirical analysis using Chongming District of Shanghai as an example. For random attacks and selective attacks on the power network, the changes in the network efficiency and the maximum number of connected subgraphs after the attack are obtained, and the network efficiency change rate is proposed as a parameter to evaluate the invulnerability. According to the simulation results, a segmented protection scheme based on real-time centrality closeness priority attack strategy is proposed to improve the invulnerability of the power network and ensure the safety of the power grid.
Key wordspower systems    invulnerability    complex network    network connectivity efficiency    closeness centrality
收稿日期: 2021-09-05      出版日期: 2023-01-09
:  TM711  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金(7271130)
通讯作者: 高岩(1962),男,黑龙江五常人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为电力系统需求侧管理,系统分析与优化等。   
作者简介: 郭明健(1994),男,江苏镇江人,硕士,主要研究方向为电力系统,复杂网络。
引用本文:   
郭明健, 高岩. 基于复杂网络理论的电力网络抗毁性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2022, 19(4): 1-6.
GUO Mingjian, GAO Yan. Invulnerability Analysis of Power Network Based on Complex Network[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2022, 19(4): 1-6.
链接本文:  
https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2022.04.001      或      https://fzkx.qdu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V19/I4/1
[1] 陈超洋, 周勇, 池明, 等. 基于复杂网络理论的大电网脆弱性研究综述[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(4):782798.
CHEN C Y, ZHOU Y, CHI M, et al. Review of large power grid vulnerability based on complex network theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2022, 37(4):782798.
[2] 徐飞阳, 薛安成, 常乃超, 等. 电力系统自动发电控制网络攻击与防御研究现状与展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(3):314.
XU F Y, XUE A C, CHANG N C, et al. Research status and prospect of cyber attack and defense on automatic generation control in power system[J]. Automation of Electric, 2021, 45(3):314.
[3] 陈思谕, 邹艳丽, 王瑞瑞, 等. 电网输电线路耦合强度分配策略研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2018, 15(2): 4553.
CHEN S Y, ZOU Y L, WANG R R, et al. On the coupling strength distribution strategy of power transmission lines [J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2018, 15(2):4553.
[4] YUAN G, GAO Y, YE B. Optimal dispatching strategy and real-time pricing for multi-regional integrated energy systems based on demand response[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 179(7): 14241446.
[5] LU Z M, GAO Y, XU C. Evaluation of energy management system for regional integrated energy system under interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy environment[J]. Energy, 2021, 222: 119860.
[6] TAN Y H, ZHANG J, LI X. Importance evaluation of power grid nodes based on complex network theory[J]. Computer Engineering, 2019, 45(11): 281286.
[7] HE M, ZOU Y L, LIANG M Y, et al. Critical node identification of a power grid based on multi-attribute decision[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(3): 2737.
[8] HAO Y, JIA L, WANG Y. Robustness of weighted networks with the harmonic closeness against cascading failures[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2020, 541: 123373.
[9] BROIDO A D, CLAUSET A. Scale-free networks are rare[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 110.
[10] YAO Y, JIANG L, XIAO H, et al. Restart-up performance of a CFB boiler after a sudden power failure accident[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31(3):830839.
[11] ZHAO Z. Research on invulnerability of wireless sensor networks based on complex network topology structure [J]. International Journal of Online Engineering, 2017, 13(3): 100112.
[12] WEI X, GAO S, HUANG T, et al. Complex network-based cascading faults graph for the analysis of transmission network vulnerability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 15(3): 12651276.
[13] THAMS F, VENZKE A, ERIKSSON R, et al. Efficient database generation for data-driven security assessment of power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 35(1): 3041.
[14] HU W H, RUAN Z H, XIAO X Y, et al. A novel voltage sag state estimation method based on complex network analysis[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 140: 108119.
[15] 曹永吉, 张恒旭, 施啸寒, 等. 规模化分布式能源参与大电网安全稳定控制的机制初探[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(18):18.
CAO Y J, ZHANG H X, SHI X H, et al. Preliminary study on participation mechanism of large-scale distributed energy resource in security and stability control of large power grid[J]. Automation of Electric, 2021, 45(18):18.
[16] 王梓行, 姜大立, 漆磊, 等. 基于冗余度的复杂网络抗毁性及节点重要度评估模型[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2020, 17(3):7885.
WANG Z H, JIANG D L, TU L, et al. Complex network invulnerability and node importance evaluation model based on redundancy[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(3):7885.
[17] 李常刚, 李华瑞, 刘玉田, 等. 大电网动态安全风险智能评估系统[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2019, 43(22):6775.
LI C G, LI H R, LIU Y T, et al. Large power grid dynamic security risk intelligent assessment system[J]. Automation of Electric, 2019, 43(22):6775.
[18] LAI Q, LIU C, SUN K. Vulnerability assessment for voltage stability based on solvability regions of decoupled power flow equations[J]. Applied Energy, 2021, 304: 117738.
[19] GONZALEZ C E, LAINSCSEK C, SEJNOWSKI T J, et al. Assessing observability of chaotic systems using delay differential analysis[J]. Chaos: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2020, 30(10): 103113.
[20] LEE J, LEE Y, OH S M, et al. Betweenness centrality of teams in social networks[J]. Chaos: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2021, 31(6): 061108.
[1] 聂廷远, 王艳伟, 聂晶晶, 刘鹏飞. 基于注意力机制和复杂网络的FPGA可布性预测[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 53-59.
[2] 户佐安, 杨江浩, 邓锦程. 考虑多元变量的世界航空网络综合鲁棒性研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 60-69.
[3] 孙小慧, 刘毅, 米玉梅, 吕凯. 韧性视角下城市地铁与常规公交网络关键站点及线路识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 26-36.
[4] 牟奇锋, 李晓倩. 基于邻接矩阵的复杂网络演化融合迭代方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 79-86.
[5] 孙文静, 余路粉, 潘文林, 蓝春江. 基于节点影响因子和贡献因子的复杂网络重要节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2026, 23(1): 87-95.
[6] 卢新彪, 刘泽诚, 陈贵允, 杨铁流, 高兴. 基于图卷积网络的复杂网络能控性提升方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 24-28.
[7] 周青, 李依函, 陈文冲. “互联网+”企业创新生态系统网络演化分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 1-7.
[8] 章浩淳, 寇博潇, 张泰杰, 唐智慧. 基于Granger Causality的滑坡机理网络客观权值确定方法[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 63-70.
[9] 韩世翔, 闫光辉, 裴华艳. 复杂网络上双向免疫对传染病传播的影响[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(4): 55-62.
[10] 张琦, 汪小帆. 复杂网络观点动力学分析与干预若干研究进展[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 31-44.
[11] 张明磊, 宋玉蓉, 曲鸿博. 基于图注意力机制的复杂网络关键节点识别[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 113-119.
[12] 陶昭, 侯忠生. 复杂网络的无模型自适应牵制控制[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 120-127.
[13] 李伟莎, 王淑良, 宋博. 基于强化学习风电并网策略下的韧性分析[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(2): 128-134.
[14] 张耀波, 张胜, 王雨萱, 熊聪源. 基于K-shell的复杂网络簇生长维数研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 11-17.
[15] 詹秀秀, 叶涛, 刘闯, 刘雪梅. 农产品贸易网络中国家影响力分析与研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2025, 22(1): 26-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed